2018
DOI: 10.14214/sf.7822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate calibration of near infrared spectra for predicting nutrient concentrations of solid moose rumen contents

Abstract: Tigabu M., Felton A.M. (2018). Multivariate calibration of near infrared spectra for predicting nutrient concentrations of solid moose rumen contents. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 1 article id 7822. 14 p. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.7822 Highlights• Multivariate calibrations were established for predicting nutrient concentrations of solid moose rumen contents by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).• Crude protein, available protein and ash contents were accurately predicted.• Prediction of microbial nitrogen, ash, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NIRS reflectance spectra were acquired with XDS Rapid Content Analyzer (FOSS NIRSystems, Inc.) from 780 to 2,498 nm at an interval of 0.5 nm. After scanning a total of 481 samples, the most representative samples were selected for chemical analyses based on scores of principal component analysis (PCA) (see Tigabu & Felton, 2018 ). In brief, samples were selected as representative (i.e., spanning the entire range of variation in concentrations of nutritional constituents) depending on the distance from the center of the data in all three principal components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NIRS reflectance spectra were acquired with XDS Rapid Content Analyzer (FOSS NIRSystems, Inc.) from 780 to 2,498 nm at an interval of 0.5 nm. After scanning a total of 481 samples, the most representative samples were selected for chemical analyses based on scores of principal component analysis (PCA) (see Tigabu & Felton, 2018 ). In brief, samples were selected as representative (i.e., spanning the entire range of variation in concentrations of nutritional constituents) depending on the distance from the center of the data in all three principal components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 333 samples in question had been excluded during calibration calculations. The other constituents were predicted with slightly higher prediction error but acceptable accuracy (see Tigabu & Felton, 2018): NDF (R 2 = .92; prediction error = 2.2% dm), ADF (R 2 = .89; 1.9% dm), lignin (R 2 = .84;…”
Section: Chemical Analyses Of Rumen Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction models were cross-validated with seven segments and permutation tests with 500 re-calculations were used to analyze models. Root mean square error of the estimation (RMSEE) for observations in the workset, root mean square error computed from the selected cross validation round (RMSECV), and R 2 indicating the relationship between the measured and predicted samples were used to evaluate model performance ((80); Table S11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sample preparation, all rumen samples were dried at 65°C. We used Near-infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), as per Tigabu and Felton (2018), to predict the concentrations of different nutritional components, as this technique is rapid, nondestructive and accurate (Foley et al 1998). Each pulverized rumen sample was thoroughly mixed before drawing ca.…”
Section: Analyses Of Nutrient Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%