1981
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/30.3.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Discrimination by Shape in Relation to Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
176
1
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
176
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to analysis, all body distance measurements were log 10 -transformed to remove positive correlations between the magnitudes and variances of measurements. Variation in these characters was then summarized using a modified principal components analysis (PCA) known as shearing (Humphries et al 1981;Bookstein et al 1985;Rohlf and Bookstein 1987). The first component from traditional PCA of morphometric data typically summarizes variation due to size and is generally interpreted as such.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to analysis, all body distance measurements were log 10 -transformed to remove positive correlations between the magnitudes and variances of measurements. Variation in these characters was then summarized using a modified principal components analysis (PCA) known as shearing (Humphries et al 1981;Bookstein et al 1985;Rohlf and Bookstein 1987). The first component from traditional PCA of morphometric data typically summarizes variation due to size and is generally interpreted as such.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the principal components analysis, principal components were calculated from a covariance matrix because the first principal component scores can be used to obtain bivariate allometric equations (Jolicoeur, 1963). Although size and shape are often confounded in the first two principal components in a multigroup analysis (Humphries et al, 1981), the present data did not show clear correlation between the first two principal components for each site. Therefore, individuals were compared based on second and third principal component scores without further adjustment for body size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Truss measurements are a powerful tool for the analysis of shape, and generally are designed to cover all, or most, of the animal's body (Strauss & Bookstein, 1982). Ideally, the truss lengths measured between these landmark points should be curved vectors, as generally they lie on curved surfaces (Humphries et al, 1981). However, in this study, all the distances measured were assumed to represent straight lines lying on a flat plane.…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%