2014
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate ensemble Model Output Statistics using empirical copulas

Abstract: Statistical post-processing of ensemble forecasts usually is carried out independently for individual, scalar predictands. However, in some applications multivariate joint forecast distributions, which capture both the univariate marginal distributions of their constituent scalar predictands as well as the dependence structure among them, may be required. Copulas are functions that link multivariate distribution functions to their constituent univariate marginal distributions. Empirical copulas are non-paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on differences between components is probably the most natural, but by no means the only possible transformation of the multivariate quantity that leads to a multivariate score that is sensitive to correlations between components. In some applications, studying composite quantities like minima, maxima, or averages over several locations or lead times (Berrocal et al 2007;Feldmann et al 2015), or indexes that involve multiple quantities (Wilks 2014) is a natural way to turn multivariate quantities into univariate ones that can be evaluated by standard univariate scores. This way, specific (and practically relevant) aspects of the multivariate predictive distribution can be evaluated, and this sort of verification is another recommended supplement to general purpose multivariate scores like the ES or the VS-p presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focusing on differences between components is probably the most natural, but by no means the only possible transformation of the multivariate quantity that leads to a multivariate score that is sensitive to correlations between components. In some applications, studying composite quantities like minima, maxima, or averages over several locations or lead times (Berrocal et al 2007;Feldmann et al 2015), or indexes that involve multiple quantities (Wilks 2014) is a natural way to turn multivariate quantities into univariate ones that can be evaluated by standard univariate scores. This way, specific (and practically relevant) aspects of the multivariate predictive distribution can be evaluated, and this sort of verification is another recommended supplement to general purpose multivariate scores like the ES or the VS-p presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, simultaneous consideration of all locations in the river basin and several lead times may be required. A recent article by Wilks (2014) considers probabilistic forecasting of heat waves, which requires the simultaneous study of minimum temperature and dewpoint temperature at two consecutive days, and Feldmann et al (2015) study statistical postprocessing methods that yield calibrated temperature forecasts simultaneously at several locations. A number of multivariate generalizations of the verification rank histogram have been proposed (Smith and Hansen 2004;Wilks 2004;Gneiting et al 2008;Thorarinsdottir et al 2015;Ziegel and Gneiting 2014) that are sensitive to misrepresentations of both univariate characteristics and correlations between the different components of the multivariate quantity under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCA approach has been chosen because it is able to capture patterns of maximum covariance between two datasets; it has been found to reasonably capture atmospheric and oceanic processes (Wilks 2015). It is a robust method to investigate dominant modes of interaction, because it favors a better understanding of the relationship between groups of variables (Frankignoul et al 2011).…”
Section: Maximum Covariance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vrac and Friederichs (2015) also adapted it recently for multivariate bias correction of downscaled climate simulations. In the Schaake shuffle approach, which can be seen as an empirical copula on rank correlation (Wilks, 2014), the ensemble members are reordered so that their rank correlations across both space and variables match the ones from a randomly picked sample of observed multivariate fields. In the present application, rank correlations are considered across the 608 climatically homogeneous zones and across the three variables (precipitation, temperature, and reference evapotranspiration), and observed fields are taken from the Safran reanalysis.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Reconstructed Streamflowmentioning
confidence: 99%