Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2018
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611975031.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Fine-Grained Complexity of Longest Common Subsequence

Abstract: We revisit the classic combinatorial pattern matching problem of finding a longest common subsequence (LCS). For strings x and y of length n, a textbook algorithm solves LCS in time O(n 2 ), but although much effort has been spent, no O(n 2−ε )-time algorithm is known. Recent work indeed shows that such an algorithm would refute the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) [Abboud, Backurs, Vassilevska Williams FOCS'15; Bringmann, Künnemann FOCS'15].Despite the quadratic-time barrier, for over 40 years an e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, many conditional lower bounds in P target problems with natural DP algorithms that are proven to be near-optimal under some plausible assumption (see, e.g., [15,3,9,10,1,16,11,23,34] and [45] for an introduction to the field). Even if we restrict our attention to problems that find optimal sequence alignments under some restrictions, such as LCS, Edit Distance and LCIS, the currently known hardness proofs differ significantly, despite seemingly 1 We mention in passing that a systematic study of the complexity of LCS in terms of such input parameters has been performed recently in [17]. 2 We refer to [47] for a simple quadratic-time DP formulation for LCIS.…”
Section: Discussion Outline and Technical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, many conditional lower bounds in P target problems with natural DP algorithms that are proven to be near-optimal under some plausible assumption (see, e.g., [15,3,9,10,1,16,11,23,34] and [45] for an introduction to the field). Even if we restrict our attention to problems that find optimal sequence alignments under some restrictions, such as LCS, Edit Distance and LCIS, the currently known hardness proofs differ significantly, despite seemingly 1 We mention in passing that a systematic study of the complexity of LCS in terms of such input parameters has been performed recently in [17]. 2 We refer to [47] for a simple quadratic-time DP formulation for LCIS.…”
Section: Discussion Outline and Technical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SETH is one of the most fruitful conjectures in the Fine-Grained Complexity. There are numerous conditional lower bounds based on it for problems in P among different areas, including: dynamic data structures [61,7,45,55,3,46,41], computational geometry [24,37,75,67], pattern matching [8,22,21,25,26], graph algorithms [66,40,9,56]. See [72] for a recent survey on SETH-based lower bounds (and more).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the technological advances, MDSs are generated in different application areas such as smart buildings, smart cities, wireless sensor networks, Internet of things (IoTs), scientific experiments, ECG signals and DNA analysis, stock markets, multimedia, and industrial domains etc., [14], [15]. A tightly coupled issue with these data sets is how to determine their similarity indexes with a minimum possible computational time of the resources [16]- [18]. In the literature, different methods were proposed to solve the longest common subsequence problem particularly for multivariate data sets [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%