2018
DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate genomic predictions for age at puberty in tropically adapted beef heifers1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A remarkable improvement of prediction accuracy was achieved in this study when the multivariate model was applied to perform the GS. Several previous studies have shown that using correlated traits as auxiliary variates in the GS model can efficiently enhance the prediction accuracy and is obviously superior to the univariate model [67][68][69][70][71]. The increase of prediction accuracy estimated by the FIXED and multivariate models is mainly attributed to the higher proportion of genetic variance captured by these models than in the univariate model, as shown in the present study and previous researches [67,72].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A remarkable improvement of prediction accuracy was achieved in this study when the multivariate model was applied to perform the GS. Several previous studies have shown that using correlated traits as auxiliary variates in the GS model can efficiently enhance the prediction accuracy and is obviously superior to the univariate model [67][68][69][70][71]. The increase of prediction accuracy estimated by the FIXED and multivariate models is mainly attributed to the higher proportion of genetic variance captured by these models than in the univariate model, as shown in the present study and previous researches [67,72].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Several previous studies have shown that using correlated traits as auxiliary variates in the GS model can efficiently enhance the prediction accuracy and is obviously superior to the univariate model [66][67][68][69][70]. The increase of prediction accuracy estimated by the FIXED and multivariate models is mainly attributed to the higher proportion of genetic variance captured by these models than in the univariate model, as shown in the present study and previous researches [66,71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In contrast to AGECL, reproductive maturity score (RMS), a proxy trait for AGECL, is a categorical trait measured on a 0 to 5 scale where 0 = infantile reproductive tract, 1 = small ovarian follicles, 2 = ovarian follicles with a diameter larger than 10 mm, 3 = presence of corpus luteum, 4 = pregnancy to 10 weeks, and 5 = pregnancy longer than 10 weeks [12,13]. Unlike AGECL, for which multiple measurements are taken, RMS is measured only once, at approximately 600 days of age [12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to AGECL, reproductive maturity score (RMS), a proxy trait for AGECL, is a categorical trait measured on a 0 to 5 scale where 0 = infantile reproductive tract, 1 = small ovarian follicles, 2 = ovarian follicles with a diameter larger than 10 mm, 3 = presence of corpus luteum, 4 = pregnancy to 10 weeks, and 5 = pregnancy longer than 10 weeks [12,13]. Unlike AGECL, for which multiple measurements are taken, RMS is measured only once, at approximately 600 days of age [12,13]. Recent studies have shown that RMS is moderately heritable (h 2 = 0.23) and is highly genetically correlated (r g = − 0.83) to AGECL in tropically-adapted heifers [13], which suggests that it could be used as a proxy for AGECL in genomic evaluations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation