2013
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariatetlinear mixed models for irregularly observed multiple repeated measures with missing outcomes

Abstract: Missing outcomes or irregularly timed multivariate longitudinal data frequently occur in clinical trials or biomedical studies. The multivariate t linear mixed model (MtLMM) has been shown to be a robust approach to modeling multioutcome continuous repeated measures in the presence of outliers or heavy-tailed noises. This paper presents a framework for fitting the MtLMM with an arbitrary missing data pattern embodied within multiple outcome variables recorded at irregular occasions. To address the serial corre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem related to the prediction of future values has a great impact in many practical applications. Rao () pointed out that the predictive accuracy of future observations can be taken as an alternative measure of “goodness of fit.” In order to propose a strategy for generating predicted values from our AR(p)‐CR model we use the plug‐in approach proposed by Wang (). Thus let boldyobs be the observed response vector of dimension nobs×1 and boldypred the npred×1 response vector npred‐step‐ahead.…”
Section: Standard Error and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem related to the prediction of future values has a great impact in many practical applications. Rao () pointed out that the predictive accuracy of future observations can be taken as an alternative measure of “goodness of fit.” In order to propose a strategy for generating predicted values from our AR(p)‐CR model we use the plug‐in approach proposed by Wang (). Thus let boldyobs be the observed response vector of dimension nobs×1 and boldypred the npred×1 response vector npred‐step‐ahead.…”
Section: Standard Error and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation, the data were generated from the MNLMM with nonlinear mean curves Equation (31). The presumed model parameters are:…”
Section: Bivariate Nonlinear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specification implies that within-subject errors for all responses measured at the same occasion have variance-covariance Σ. To capture the extra autocorrelation of a given response among irregularly-observed occasions, some parsimonious dependence structures can be made on C i , such as the compound symmetry, the p-order autoregressive model [29,30] and the damped exponential correlation [31]. For simplicity, we write C i = C i (φ), which depends on subject i according to its dimension s i with each entry being a function of a small set of parameters φ describing within-subject autocorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this type of multiple outcomes (CD4 and CD8 cell counts), the underlying statistical question is to estimate the functions that model their dependence on covariates and to investigate the relationships between these functions. Similar clinical and epidemiological studies often generate clustered as well as longitudinal follow-up data with bivariate or multivariate outcomes as primary endpoints, which are routinely analyzed using multivariate linear mixed-effects (LME) models (Ghosh et al, 2007;Matsuyama and Ohashi, 1997;Sammel et al, 1999;Shah et al, 1997;Wang andFan, 2010, 2011;Wang, 2013;among others.). In this article, we focus on a bivariate LME (BLME) model on the situation where two response variables (CD4 and CD8 cell counts) are observed simultaneously for each subject to accommodate individual-level clustering within subjects as well as the correlation between bivariate measures, and to facilitate borrowing of strength across all subjects when assessing the effects of covariates through treatment time, baseline age, treatment group, viral load at baseline, and time-varying treatment efficacy, etc., on AIDS progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%