2017
DOI: 10.37236/6374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Normal Limit Laws for the Numbers of Fringe Subtrees in $m$-ary Search Trees and Preferential Attachment Trees

Abstract: We study fringe subtrees of random m-ary search trees and of preferential attachment trees, by putting them in the context of generalised Pólya urns. In particular we show that for the random m-ary search trees with m ≤ 26 and for the linear preferential attachment trees, the number of fringe subtrees that are isomorphic to an arbitrary fixed tree T converges to a normal distribution; more generally, we also prove multivariate normal distribution results for random vectors of such numbers for different fringe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also (1.3) holds, at least under some supplementary assumptions, see [8,Remark 4.2], and then the results above hold. (In the examples from [14] and [7] just mentioned, (1.3) holds because there is an equivalent urn with random replacements that satisfies the conditions of [8].) Remark 1.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also (1.3) holds, at least under some supplementary assumptions, see [8,Remark 4.2], and then the results above hold. (In the examples from [14] and [7] just mentioned, (1.3) holds because there is an equivalent urn with random replacements that satisfies the conditions of [8].) Remark 1.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55] and [66]. For m-ary search trees, the situation is more complicated: no results for general fringe trees have been published (this is work in progress [68]), but some special cases (such as the degree distribution and the number of fringe trees of a given size) and related quantities (the number of internal nodes) have been treated, and it turns out that central limit theorems hold for m 26 but not for m 27, see e.g. [95], [93], [90], [30], [69], [29], [53], [74] and [67].…”
Section: Asymptotic Normality?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their very recent paper [10], Holmgren, Janson and Šileikis approached the same question from a different angle: using Pólya urns, they proved that the number of fringe subtrees isomorphic to a given rooted tree is asymptotically normally distributed. They also proved joint normality for different fringe subtrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%