2012
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Phenotype Association Analysis by Marker‐Set Kernel Machine Regression

Abstract: Genetic studies of complex diseases often collect multiple phenotypes relevant to the disorders. As these phenotypes can be correlated and share common genetic mechanisms, jointly analyzing these traits may bring more power to detect genes influencing individual or multiple phenotypes. Given the advancement brought by the multivariate phenotype approaches and the multimarker kernel machine regression, we construct a multivariate regression based on kernel machine to facilitate the joint evaluation of multimark… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
142
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering multiple phenotypes that measure the different aspects of underlying diseases, the power of the association analysis can potentially be improved (Zhang et al, 2010;Maity et al, 2012). Several methods were recently developed to detect the joint effect of genetic variants on multivariate phenotype (Tao et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By considering multiple phenotypes that measure the different aspects of underlying diseases, the power of the association analysis can potentially be improved (Zhang et al, 2010;Maity et al, 2012). Several methods were recently developed to detect the joint effect of genetic variants on multivariate phenotype (Tao et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the performance of GSU by comparing it with variance component score (VCscore) test under univariate or multivariate linear mixed model (Wu et al, 2011;Maity et al, 2012). For each simulation, we created 1000 simulation replicates to evaluate type I error and power.…”
Section: ) and A Cauchy-distributed Phenotype (Denoted As C) Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the corresponding b hj 6 ¼ 0). As discussed in more detail in Kim et al (2016), MTSPUsSet (1, 1) is like a burden test (Shen et al, 2010), while MTSPUsSet (c 1 , c 2 ) for large values of c 1 and c 2 is effectively equivalent to a univariate minimum P value test on all single SNP-single trait pairs; MTSPUsSet(2, 2) is closely related to a variance-component score test in kernel machine regression (Maity et al, 2012) A main innovation here is to use a matrix normal distribution (Gupta and Nagar, 1999;Zhou, 2014) to obtain P values based on the known asymptotic normal distribution of the Z scores under H 0 . Specifically, denote Z (i) as the ith row vector, and Z j as the jth column vector (i.e.…”
Section: Gene-based Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another extreme is the burden test (Shen et al 2010;Guo et al 2013;Mukherjee et al 2014), which is powerful in the presence of a dense association pattern, in which most SNP-trait pairs are associated with almost equal effect sizes and directions; otherwise, e.g., when the association directions of some SNP-trait pairs are different, it does not perform well (as is well known for analysis of rare variants). A compromise between the above two extremes is a variance-component test (Maity et al 2012;Wang et al 2013), which is more robust to association density/ sparsity and varying association directions. Nevertheless, as shown in the context of multiple rare variants and a single trait , it may still suffer from power loss in the presence of more sparse association patterns (i.e., when there are fewer associated SNP-trait pairs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several but not many methods have been proposed for gene-based multitrait analysis (Maity et al 2012;Guo et al 2013;Van der Sluis et al 2015;Wang et al 2015). The simplest way is to use the minimum P-value (minP) test based on the most significant single-SNP-singletrait association, which, however, may lose power in the presence of multiple weak associations between multiple SNPs and multiple traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%