2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-017-0361-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Relationships between Snowmelt and Plant Distributions in the High Arctic Tundra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These species are distributed widely and are major components with a greater biomass (Van der Wal et al 2000). Similar to these results, Park et al (2018) examined the dominant plant species in Ny-Ålesund, which were classified into the following three groups, while simultaneously considering species abundance and niche overlap: Group 1 (L. confuse and S. polaris), Group 2 (Saxifraga oppositifolia, B. vivipara, and S. acaulis), and Group 3 (D. octopetala and C. tetragona). In addition, O. digyna (Polygonaceae) also occurs in diverse habitats at elevations from sea level to 4,500 m throughout the Arctic and in the mountain range (Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Plant-species Co-occurrence Pattern and Richnesssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These species are distributed widely and are major components with a greater biomass (Van der Wal et al 2000). Similar to these results, Park et al (2018) examined the dominant plant species in Ny-Ålesund, which were classified into the following three groups, while simultaneously considering species abundance and niche overlap: Group 1 (L. confuse and S. polaris), Group 2 (Saxifraga oppositifolia, B. vivipara, and S. acaulis), and Group 3 (D. octopetala and C. tetragona). In addition, O. digyna (Polygonaceae) also occurs in diverse habitats at elevations from sea level to 4,500 m throughout the Arctic and in the mountain range (Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Plant-species Co-occurrence Pattern and Richnesssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several studies on the plant ecology in Ny-Ålesund have examined vegetation development (Yoshitake et al 2011), the photosynthetic characteristics of dominant plant species (Muraoka et al 2008), colonization characteristics of Salix polaris (Nakatsubo et al 2010), root-associated fungal communities among plant species (Davey et al 2015), cover change of vegetation and glaciers (Ren et al 2021), vegetation maps (Moreau et al 2005), and relationships between snowmelt and plant distribution (Park et al 2018); however, the vegetation composition and co-occurrence associated with the main dominant plant species have received much less attention. Moreover, the dominant plant patches in Arctic environments remain poorly explored.…”
Section: Sonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The melt factor is estimated according to the following relationship: Mf={Ta×bold-italicDDF,0.5emTa>Tcbold0,0.5emTaTc0.25em where M f is the melt factor (mm/day), and DDF is the degree‐day factor (mm/(°C·day)), which is considered as 37.5 for mountain snow, according to Lang and Braun (1990). Further, different vegetation cover will result in different amount of melt (Park et al, 2018; Winkler et al, 2018) and it is possible to use a land use landcover (LULC) map as an input and specify different spatially distributed snowmelt factors. The model in PCRaster is made in such a way that different snowmelt factors can be given as a spatially distributed input.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%