Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets 2016
DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Research Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, item skewness for ATCB ranged from −1.53 to −0.93, and item kurtosis ranged from 0.68 to 3.32. However, univariate normality is a necessary but not sufficient condition for multivariate normality (Henson, 1999). By using Mplus 8.2 software (Muthén & Muthén, 2018) it was determined that the data were not multivariate normal as the scaling correction factor was 1.578.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, item skewness for ATCB ranged from −1.53 to −0.93, and item kurtosis ranged from 0.68 to 3.32. However, univariate normality is a necessary but not sufficient condition for multivariate normality (Henson, 1999). By using Mplus 8.2 software (Muthén & Muthén, 2018) it was determined that the data were not multivariate normal as the scaling correction factor was 1.578.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skewness and kurtosis of these 11 items ranged from −1.27 to −1.00 and from 1.57 to 3.25, respectively. However, univariate normality is only a necessary but not sufficient condition for multivariate normality (Henson, 1999) so Mardia's coefficient of multivariate kurtosis was calculated using the DeCarlo (1997) macro. The normalized (i.e., standardized) coefficient was 163.55.…”
Section: Subsample a Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%