Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat00821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Symmetry and Asymmetry

Abstract: Univariate symmetry has interesting and diverse forms of generalization to the multivariate case. Here several leading concepts of multivariate symmetry—spherical, elliptical, central, and angular—are examined and various closely related notions discussed. Methods for testing the hypothesis of symmetry and approaches for measuring the direction and magnitude of skewness are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…so the symmetry assumption made here represents the most direct non-parametric extension of univariate symmetry; see Serfling (2006) for more concepts of multivariate symmetry. The class of distributions encompassed by Assumption 1 is very large and includes elliptically symmetric distributions, which play a very important role in mean-variance analysis because they guarantee full compatibility with expected utility maximization regardless of investor preferences (Berk, 1997;Chamberlain, 1983;Owen and Rabinovitch, 1983).…”
Section: Mlr Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…so the symmetry assumption made here represents the most direct non-parametric extension of univariate symmetry; see Serfling (2006) for more concepts of multivariate symmetry. The class of distributions encompassed by Assumption 1 is very large and includes elliptically symmetric distributions, which play a very important role in mean-variance analysis because they guarantee full compatibility with expected utility maximization regardless of investor preferences (Berk, 1997;Chamberlain, 1983;Owen and Rabinovitch, 1983).…”
Section: Mlr Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus recall several definitions in probability theory and convex optimization. [225]) Let ξ ∈ R r be a random variable, whose probability density function is f : R r → R. If f(ξ − θ) = f(θ − ξ), then ξ has a distribution that is centrally symmetric about θ ∈ R r . [31]) Let x ∈ R n be the decision variables and A i ∈ R (n i −1)×r , H ∈ R p×r and h, c i ∈ R r , β i ∈ R n i −1 , g ∈ R p , d i ∈ R (∀i ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Probabilistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the GRS framework, we assume that the disturbance vectors ε t in (1) are independently distributed over time, conditional on F. We do not require the disturbance vectors to be identically distributed, but we do assume that they remain symmetrically distributed See Serfling (2006) for more on multivariate symmetry. The class of distributions encompassed by the diagonal symmetry condition includes elliptically symmetric distributions, which play a very important role in mean-variance analysis because they guarantee full compatibility with expected utility maximization regardless of investor preferences; see Chamberlain (1983), Owen andRabinovitch (1983), andBerk (1997).…”
Section: Statistical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%