2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-019-01037-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiverse Optimisation Algorithm for Capturing the Critical Slip Surface in Slope Stability Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are a slightly on higher side when compared with CS, CS-BC, BBO and ICA, reason can be due to the method used to calculate FS as the difference is almost negligible. The standard deviation is obtained with ALO (0.162) is smaller than the one obtained by BBO (0.384) [46] but slightly more than MVO (0.1229) [49]. Figure 10 reports the critical slip surface obtained by solving the benchmark example by using the current [92] Genetic algorithm 1.288 Jongmin et al [93] Limit equilibrium with the velocity field and plastic zone 1.37 Zhu et al [94] A generalised framework of LEM 1.373 Kashani et al [48] Imperialistic Competitive Algorithm (ICA) 1.3625 Mishra et al [50] Teaching-learning-based optimisation (TLBO) 1.315-1.466 ALO (This study)…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results are a slightly on higher side when compared with CS, CS-BC, BBO and ICA, reason can be due to the method used to calculate FS as the difference is almost negligible. The standard deviation is obtained with ALO (0.162) is smaller than the one obtained by BBO (0.384) [46] but slightly more than MVO (0.1229) [49]. Figure 10 reports the critical slip surface obtained by solving the benchmark example by using the current [92] Genetic algorithm 1.288 Jongmin et al [93] Limit equilibrium with the velocity field and plastic zone 1.37 Zhu et al [94] A generalised framework of LEM 1.373 Kashani et al [48] Imperialistic Competitive Algorithm (ICA) 1.3625 Mishra et al [50] Teaching-learning-based optimisation (TLBO) 1.315-1.466 ALO (This study)…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Zolfaghari et al [95] Genetic algorithm (GA) 1.24 Cheng et al [26] Simulated annealing (SA) 1.2813 Cheng et al [87] Tabu search (TS) 1.4661 Cheng et al [87] Ant colony optimisation (ACO) 1.5817 Cheng et al [87] Harmony search (HS) 1.2405 Cheng et al [87] Modified harmony search (MHS) 1.1315 Cheng et al [24] Modified Particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) 1.1289 Cheng et al [20] Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) 1.1095 Khajehzadeh et al [30] Gravitational search algorithm 1.0785 Kang et al [27] Artificial bee colony optimisation (ABC) 1.086 Gandomi et al [28] Firefly algorithm (FA) 1.303 Gandomi et al [28] Cuckoo search (CS) 1.0635 Gandomi et al [28] Cuckoo search-boundary constraint (CS-BC) 1.0502 Gandomi et al [46] Biogeography-based optimization (BBO) 1.055 Gandomi et al [46] Differential evolution (DE) 1.659 Gandomi et al [46] Evolutionary strategy (ES) 1.502 Mishra et al [49] Multi verse optimiser (MVO) 1.1447-1.7362 ALO (This study)…”
Section: Source Methods Fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Energy-efficient routing protocols like topology-based WBAN [26], multi-hop based WBAN [27], medium access control based WBAN [28,29], and priority-based WBAN [30] are proposed by the authors. In order to reduce the consumption of energy in an efficient manner, various optimization algorithms [31][32][33][34][35][36] have been explored in the area of wireless technology [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. However, such algorithms don't focus much on WBAN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%