2016
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1180573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiversity of the twenty-first century – examining opportunities for integrating community engagement in planning curricula

Abstract: This paper examines student-community engagement activity in planning. This is a subset of university-community engagement, and is a point of overlap between such engagement and planning education. Community engagement activity enables students to learn in situ practical skills within live projects, while community partners may benefit from technical knowhow, and labour input. Based on a UK-wide survey and three in-depth case studies, the paper explores the pedagogical designs underpinning community engagement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, researchers characterised CE as a collaboration between HEIs and their larger communities for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in the context of partnership and reciprocity ( Bhagwan, 2018 ; Fitzgerald et al., 2016 ; Holley and Harris, 2018 ; Ramachandra and Mansor, 2014 ). Further, studies emphasise that CE aims at working with the community rather than working for the community ( Frank and Sieh, 2016 ; Korzun et al., 2014a ). The central core process involves HEIs reciprocally engaging different internal and external stakeholders in sharing valuable resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, researchers characterised CE as a collaboration between HEIs and their larger communities for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in the context of partnership and reciprocity ( Bhagwan, 2018 ; Fitzgerald et al., 2016 ; Holley and Harris, 2018 ; Ramachandra and Mansor, 2014 ). Further, studies emphasise that CE aims at working with the community rather than working for the community ( Frank and Sieh, 2016 ; Korzun et al., 2014a ). The central core process involves HEIs reciprocally engaging different internal and external stakeholders in sharing valuable resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explores the pedagogical design helps to explore the underpinning community engagement activities involving students, as well as the various capacities in which the different participants where students, instructors and community members participate. An alignment of student engagement activities in the planning curriculum with emerging transformative co-learning models of university-community engagement could offer novel opportunities for the discipline of planning and their impact on communities as well as the fields standing in multiversities [17]. In designing teaching activities within the university, the community engagement with a view to understanding the impacts on community participants is important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities have risen to the challenge and are involved on many levels (De Lange, 2012), as can be seen in their extensive community involvement. On a practical level, community engagement can even be included in planning curricula so that lecturers can design teaching activities accordingly (Frank & Sieh, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the community's goal and the educational goal are addressed (Thomson et al, 2010). One of the goals of service-learning is to combine teaching in the classroom with community service that will make a difference (Copeland et al, 2016;Frank & Sieh, 2016). Through service-learning, students can thus gain field experience that will stand them in good stead later in their careers (Coffey, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%