2001
DOI: 10.1117/1.1406944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MultiView: Multilevel video content representation and retrieval

Abstract: Abstract. In this article, several practical algorithms are proposed to support content-based video analysis, modeling, representation, summarization, indexing, and access. First, a multilevel video database model is given. One advantage of this model is that it provides a reasonable approach to bridging the gap between low-level representative features and high-level semantic concepts from a human point of view. Second, several model-based video analysis techniques are proposed. In order to detect the video s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It supports fuzzy spatial queries including querying spatial relationships between objects. Multilevel video database model provides a reasonable approach to bridging the gap between low-level representation features and high level semantic concepts from a human point of view [14] [15]. A hierarchical semantics, sensitive video classifier is proposed to shorten the semantic gap between the low-level visual features and high level semantic concepts.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It supports fuzzy spatial queries including querying spatial relationships between objects. Multilevel video database model provides a reasonable approach to bridging the gap between low-level representation features and high level semantic concepts from a human point of view [14] [15]. A hierarchical semantics, sensitive video classifier is proposed to shorten the semantic gap between the low-level visual features and high level semantic concepts.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing content-based video retrieval systems use one of two widelyaccepted approaches to access videos in a database [Flickner et al 1995;Pentland et al 1996;Rui et al 1998;Humrapur et al 1997;Chang et al 1998;Satoh and Kanade 1997;Deng and Manjunath 1998;Fan et al 2001a]: shot-based and object-based. These video retrieval systems, however, only focus on how to obtain these video access units (i.e., video shots and video objects), whereas few of them reveal or publish their video database models and indexing structures.…”
Section: Hierarchical Video Database Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach suffers from the problem of curse of dimensionality because the visual features used for video representation are normally in high dimensions. One reasonable solution to this problem is first to classify videos into a set of clusters and then to perform the dimensionality reduction on these clusters independently [Fan et al 2001a;Zhang et al 1997]. Traditional database indexing trees can supposedly be used for indexing these video clusters independently, with relatively low-dimensional features.…”
Section: Hierarchical Video Database Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multilevel models constitute a possible approach toward the solution of this problem. An advantage of these models is that they provide a reasonable way to bridge the gap between lowlevel visual features and high level semantic concepts [16].…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%