2005
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200400536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Covalently Modified with Fast Black K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25][26]28] In addition we have physisorbed a host of small hydrophobic organic molecules onto the surface of graphite powder [31] and also formed agglomerates of MWCNTs consisting of bundles of MWCNTs, % 10 mm in size, running into and throughout an amorphous redox active molecular solid such as 1, 2-napthaquinone and 9, 10-phenanthraquinone [27] Despite the characterisation of these chemically modified graphitic materials revealing that the modifier is always bound to the surface of graphite or MWCNT powder, and the material remains abrasively immobilised onto the surface of the electrode, we frequently observed that these materials exhibited square root of scan rate dependencies of their peak currents. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31] Herein we seek to explain this, perhaps surprising, phenomenon by noting that in these cases the interfacial kinetics are not controlled by diffusion of a species in solution (the Cottrell model), but by diffusion of charge over the surface of the carbon particles as electrons hop from one chemical moiety attached to the carbon surface to another, as shown in Figure 1. We apply chronoamperometric techniques combined with our newly developed theory and computer simulations to explore this system, rather than only cyclic voltammetry as Amatore used, [20,21] and find that at no point do we observe Cottrellian behaviour with a t À1=2 dependence of current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[22][23][24][25][26]28] In addition we have physisorbed a host of small hydrophobic organic molecules onto the surface of graphite powder [31] and also formed agglomerates of MWCNTs consisting of bundles of MWCNTs, % 10 mm in size, running into and throughout an amorphous redox active molecular solid such as 1, 2-napthaquinone and 9, 10-phenanthraquinone [27] Despite the characterisation of these chemically modified graphitic materials revealing that the modifier is always bound to the surface of graphite or MWCNT powder, and the material remains abrasively immobilised onto the surface of the electrode, we frequently observed that these materials exhibited square root of scan rate dependencies of their peak currents. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31] Herein we seek to explain this, perhaps surprising, phenomenon by noting that in these cases the interfacial kinetics are not controlled by diffusion of a species in solution (the Cottrell model), but by diffusion of charge over the surface of the carbon particles as electrons hop from one chemical moiety attached to the carbon surface to another, as shown in Figure 1. We apply chronoamperometric techniques combined with our newly developed theory and computer simulations to explore this system, rather than only cyclic voltammetry as Amatore used, [20,21] and find that at no point do we observe Cottrellian behaviour with a t À1=2 dependence of current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the case of immobilized hemispherical dendrimers containing electroactive groups at their surface, Amatore et al observed a linear dependence of peak current with the square root of scan rate in cyclic voltammetry [29,30], and this was explained by charge hopping between the redox sites. For many other cases of functionalized carbon nanotubes (or modified graphite electrodes), Compton et al also identified a square root of scan rate dependency of peak currents [31,32]. These findings have been explained on a theoretical basis by the (non-Cottrellian) propagation of charge on the carbon particle surface [33,34], whereby electrons are assumed to hop from one chemical moiety to another, all being attached to the particle surface, as depicted in Figure 6.7.…”
Section: Theory J183mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The electron transfer between the CNT and the aryl diazonium salt triggered the formation of the aryl radicals. Posterior developments allowed performing this reaction in water [62] and to generate highly functionalized carbon nanotubes using micelle-coated CNTs [63,64]. In situ generation of the diazonium salt provided functionalized well-dispersed nanotubes in organic solvents [65,66], in aqueous solutions [67] and in solvent-free conditions [68].…”
Section: Radical Additionsmentioning
confidence: 99%