2010
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.2.000678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiwavelength Multicast Packet Switch: Performance Analysis and Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that required the number of FDLs in the proposed multicast switch is 23 and 25 for N=8 and 16, respectively; while the required number of FDLs in the broadcast-and-select switch is 22 and 23 for N=8 and 16, respectively. Since the packet loss probability of the broadcast-and-select switch is independent of multicast traffic ratio [11], the required number of SOA gates is also independent of the multicast traffic ratio; however, it increases rapidly with the switch size. For the proposed multicast switch, to achieve a fixed packet loss probability, the required number of SOA gates is much fewer than that of the broadcast-and-select switch, and it increases slowly depending on the multicast traffic ratio and switch size.…”
Section: B Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that required the number of FDLs in the proposed multicast switch is 23 and 25 for N=8 and 16, respectively; while the required number of FDLs in the broadcast-and-select switch is 22 and 23 for N=8 and 16, respectively. Since the packet loss probability of the broadcast-and-select switch is independent of multicast traffic ratio [11], the required number of SOA gates is also independent of the multicast traffic ratio; however, it increases rapidly with the switch size. For the proposed multicast switch, to achieve a fixed packet loss probability, the required number of SOA gates is much fewer than that of the broadcast-and-select switch, and it increases slowly depending on the multicast traffic ratio and switch size.…”
Section: B Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. So, link (3,4) should be firstly added to network coding multicast sub-graph and for constructing the multicast routing. The edge-disjoint paths for the destination t 1 and t 2 are S-2-3-4-t 1 and S-1-3-4-t 2 , which are added to the sub-graph, respectively.…”
Section: Problem Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optical multicast routing and wavelength assignment are two fundamental problems in WDM networks. The multicast routing usually needs to construct a multicast tree to transmit the information flow from the source node through tree's each wavelength channel exactly once to a group of destinations [3]. How to optimize the multicast tree and wavelength assignment has great effect on the network's performance, network throughput, the wavelength utilization and the blocking probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, they can be divided into two categories based on the type of switches adopted: Multicast scheduling for electronic switches, see, for example, [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and multicast scheduling for optical switches, such as [15], [16], [17], [18]. Most multicast scheduling algorithms for electronic switches adopt the input queued (IQ) switching architecture, due to the fact that the internal bandwidth of IQ switch only needs to be as fast as the link rate, which is very promising for large routers and switches with very high port speed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many multicast scheduling schemes in optical packet switches (OPS) rely on Fiber Delay Lines (FDLs), an optical device capable of delaying packets for a specific amount of time, to resolve output contention [15], [16], [17], [18], as a practical "optical RAM" able to mimic the buffers used in electronic switches is still not available currently. In wavelength-assisted routing [15], [16], multicast packets are sent to multicast modules, where a FDL loop device is used to generate copies of the packet and provide necessary latency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%