2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiwavelength observations of GRB 140629A

Abstract: Aims. We investigate the long gamma-ray burst (GRB) 140629A through multiwavelength observations to derive the properties of the dominant jet and its host galaxy. Methods. The afterglow and host galaxy observations were taken in the optical (Swift/UVOT and various facilities worldwide), infrared (Spitzer), and X-rays (Swift/XRT) between 40 s and 3 yr after the burst trigger. Results. Polarisation observations by the MASTER telescope indicate that this burst is weakly polarised. The optical spectrum contains ab… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jet breaks were thought to be observed in pre-Swift observations of GRBs (e.g., [53,228,229]), however, only a few were confirmed as being achromatic [230][231][232]. While there have been some cases of confirmed achromatic jet breaks in post-Swift GRBs (e.g., GRB 050525A and GRB 140629A; [233,234]), they are small in number [186,[235][236][237], and for some GRBs, no jet break has been detected for months [238] or even years after the initial gamma-ray detection [224]. These extreme cases can pose problems for the external shock models, requiring extreme values of the physical parameters of the explosion, the emission mechanism, and the environment to explain them [224].…”
Section: Jet Breaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jet breaks were thought to be observed in pre-Swift observations of GRBs (e.g., [53,228,229]), however, only a few were confirmed as being achromatic [230][231][232]. While there have been some cases of confirmed achromatic jet breaks in post-Swift GRBs (e.g., GRB 050525A and GRB 140629A; [233,234]), they are small in number [186,[235][236][237], and for some GRBs, no jet break has been detected for months [238] or even years after the initial gamma-ray detection [224]. These extreme cases can pose problems for the external shock models, requiring extreme values of the physical parameters of the explosion, the emission mechanism, and the environment to explain them [224].…”
Section: Jet Breaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maximize the SNR of the optical light curves, we followed the methodology of Oates et al (2009) to combine the individual filter light curves into one single filter (Schady et al 2010;Kann et al 2010;Oates et al 2012;Roming et al 2017;Hu et al 2019). First, the ground-based photometry was converted from magnitudes to count rate using an arbitrary zero-point.…”
Section: Combined Optical Light Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 ofHu et al (2019) gives Γ = β + 1 = 2.040, but this is likely missing ∆Γ = 0.5 as in the first SED results of the table for the "BKP" models.A56, page 39 of 43Kann, D. A., et al: A&A, 686, A56 (2024) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRB 140629A, z = 2.276 ± 0.001 Data are taken from Xin et al (2018); Hu et al (2019), from GCN Circulars (Bikmaev et al 2014a;Maehara 2014;Takaki et al 2014;Kuroda et al 2014b;Perley & Cenko 2014b,a;Garnavich & Rose 2014;D'Avanzo et al 2014b;Honda et al 2014;Moskvitin et al 2014a,b;Yano et al 2014;Pandey & Kumar 2014b), as well as our own Swift UVOT data set, which expands that presented in Hu et al (2019) and also fixes errors in the upper limits presented in that work. The redshift is given by Hu et al (2019). The light curve evolution is complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation