2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multizone airflow models for calculating infiltration rates in commercial reference buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Air infiltration rates in schools, grocery, and other retail stores were all assumed to equal 0.2/h when calculating C in. This assumed value is based on multizone modeling by Ng et al (2013) that simulated annual airflow using an average building envelope airtightness parameter measured from U.S. commercial buildings. Mean k inf modeled with the HVAC system running ranged between 0.05/h for the hospital reference building, and 0.52/h for the restaurant.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air infiltration rates in schools, grocery, and other retail stores were all assumed to equal 0.2/h when calculating C in. This assumed value is based on multizone modeling by Ng et al (2013) that simulated annual airflow using an average building envelope airtightness parameter measured from U.S. commercial buildings. Mean k inf modeled with the HVAC system running ranged between 0.05/h for the hospital reference building, and 0.52/h for the restaurant.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a previous review paper by the author and the nature of the current study, a fixed value of 0.1 h À1 for k di is deemed to be reasonable and adopted herein [29]. Infiltration for commercial buildings is generally very small compared to the supply air flow [30] and hence it is assumed to be zero. It should be emphasized that infiltration rates and deposition are not sensitive parameters in this study as the removal rate by ventilation is at substantially higher than those values for practical scenarios.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumed value of k inf = 0.2/h is based on multizone modeling by Ng et al. () that simulated annual airflow using an average building envelope airtightness parameter measured from US commercial buildings. The parameter k mech is the difference between the measured k oa and assumed k inf .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured values of k rec in other studies of retail stores (Bennett et al, 2011;Siegel et al, 2012) suggest 3/h is a reasonable central estimate. The assumed value of k inf = 0.2/h is based on multizone modeling by Ng et al (2013) that simulated annual airflow using an average building envelope airtightness parameter measured from US commercial buildings. The parameter k mech is the difference between the measured k oa and assumed k inf .…”
Section: Estimates Of Indoor Emission Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%