2019
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1624257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Municipal population size and the benefits of inter-municipal cooperation: panel data evidence from Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to these findings, one measure would be to establish an inter-municipal cooperation to internalise benefit spillover (Fr ere et al, 2014). This organisation would mitigate the spatial heterogenous effect and enable participating municipalities to enjoy economies of scale (Baba and Asami, 2020). Another possibility is to consider the balance of public expenses between central and local governments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response to these findings, one measure would be to establish an inter-municipal cooperation to internalise benefit spillover (Fr ere et al, 2014). This organisation would mitigate the spatial heterogenous effect and enable participating municipalities to enjoy economies of scale (Baba and Asami, 2020). Another possibility is to consider the balance of public expenses between central and local governments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ashworth et al (2005) argued that income level has a positive effect on public expenditures, as exemplified in Flemish municipalities. The ratio of the daytime population to the municipal population is also an important factor, not only for indicating the intensity of economic activities' aggregation but also for controlling spillover from a high degree of social welfare and consumption in the city (Baba and Asami, 2020). Moreover, industrial structure should be related to the extent of subsidies to industries, and variation in the industrial proportion can reveal differences in local expenditure (Seaton, 2010).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Klok et al (2018), trust is related to benefits such as improved service quality and municipal and regional capacity. However, Baba and Asami (2020), show that the expenditure share of IMC reduces total expenditures. Nonetheless, no research has been conducted to determine whether officials' perceptions of these horizontal variables are that they improve fiscal efficiency.…”
Section: Horizontal and Vertical Relations To Achieve Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Feiock's research (Feiock, 2004, 2007, 2009, 2013; Feiock et al, 2017), which revealed relationships among key variables of ICA, other studies have been conducted in various areas, including economic development (Chen et al, 2016; Hawkins & Andrew, 2010; Lee et al, 2012; Park & Feiock, 2006; Percoco, 2016), the environmental arena (Gerber et al, 2013; Yi et al, 2018), and emergency policies (Wilson, et al 2020). Benefits of IMC are likely to be captured in the capital‐intensive service areas of firefighting and sanitation, which require the collaboration of small municipalities that have difficulty making large capital investments (Baba & Asami, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive effects from IMC have also been identified in the wastewater sector [ 9 ], especially for small municipalities that can use IMC to overcome municipal fragmentation [ 10 ]. In addition to the commonly examined MSWM, positive effects from IMC on reducing municipal spending on public health and fire protection were shown in Japan [ 11 ], and similar positive effects occurred also in Brazil with spending on culture, housing, social assistance, and again health care [ 12 ]. Within the aforementioned papers, however, in most cases the analysis of IMC benefits was limited to a rather short period (often a few years or even just a single year), making the results partially questionable regarding the long-term sustainability of the observed benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%