2018
DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2017.1364646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Gis: Case Study of Bursa Province

Abstract: Rapid population growth, economic development and industrialization have created many problems related to municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in developing countries like Turkey. Solid waste disposal has become mandatory because of increasingly common factors such as global warming and contamination of water resources. In recent years, this situation has revealed the need for effective management of solid waste. Suitable site selection requires evaluation and analysis of multiplefactor. Therefore, it is ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of novel technologies to reduce the adverse effects arising from municipal solid waste in Iran and other developing countries seems to be necessary and imperative. This task can be more convenient and less time-consuming by using integration of knowledge of local experts involving in waste management practices and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. Many research have focused on some kinds of fuzzy-logic abilities to find the most likely suitable area for landfill to improve the knowledge of decision-making process [[13], [14], [15], [16]].…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of novel technologies to reduce the adverse effects arising from municipal solid waste in Iran and other developing countries seems to be necessary and imperative. This task can be more convenient and less time-consuming by using integration of knowledge of local experts involving in waste management practices and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. Many research have focused on some kinds of fuzzy-logic abilities to find the most likely suitable area for landfill to improve the knowledge of decision-making process [[13], [14], [15], [16]].…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIS is a suitable tool for site selection since it has the capability to manage large amount of spatial data that comes from various sources (Kao et al, 1996). Therefor, some researchers such as: (Ahmed Mussa and Suryabhagavan 2019), (Township, 2016), (Harg, 1992), (ANNUAL REPORT, 2016), (Yildirim et al, 2018), (William, 2015) and (Environmental Guidelines, 2016) studied Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS. Their goals were to select suitable site for landfill.…”
Section: Gis Based Landfill Site Selection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to determine the waste disposal site in Ladakh. Yildirim et al (2018) determined the municiapal solid waste disposal site using TOPSIS and GIS techniques in Bursa province by considering the economic, social, and environmental factors. Ding & et al (2018) combined the AHP entropy with GIS to select the municapl waste disposal site by consideing the criteria such as distance from surface water, distance from protected areas, agriculturals land, distance from tourist areas, transport costs, land prices, distance from residential areas, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shah & et al (2019),Danesh & et al (2019),Feyzi & et al (2019),Alam & et al (2019),Ghazifard and Mortazavi Chamchali (2019),Abdullah et al(2019), Ebadi Torkayesh et al(2019),Wadhwa (2018),Wichapa & Khokhajaikiat(2018),Midatana et.al(2018,Islam et al(2018,Mohammed et al (2018),Saatsaz et.al (2018),Yousefi & et al (2018),,, Nabi Dar et al(2018),Yildirim et al (2018),Ding & et al (2018),, Syed Ismail(2017), Memarbashi et al (2017), Guler & Yomralıoglu (2017), Chabuk et al (2017), Hariz & et al (2017), Kharat et al (2016), Fagbohun & Aladejana (2016), Chauhan & Singh (2016) Slope C1 Shah & et al (2019),Danesh & et al (2019),Feyzi & et al (2019),Alam & et al (2019), Ghazifard and Mortazavi Chamchali (2019), Abdullah et al(2019), Ebadi Torkayesh et al(2019), Wadhwa (2018), Wichapa & Khokhajaikiat(2018), Midatana et.al(2018,Islam et al(2018), Mohammed et al (2018), Saatsaz et.al (2018), Yousefi & et al (2018), Soroudi & et al (2018), Soroudi et al (2018), Nabi Dar et al (2018), Yildirim et al (2018), Ding & et al (2018), Mohammed et al(2017), Syed Ismail(2017), Memarbashi et al (2017), Guler & Yomralıoglu (2017), Chabuk et al (2017), Hariz & et al (2017), Kharat et al (2016), Fagbohun & Aladejana (2016), Chauhan & Singh (2016) Height C2 Shah & et al (2019),Danesh & et al (2019),Feyzi & et al (2019),Alam & et al (2019), Ghazifard and Mortazavi Chamchali (2019), Abdullah et al(2019), Ebadi Torkayesh et al(2019), Wadhwa (2018), Wichapa & Khokhajaikiat(2018), Midatana et.al(2018,Islam et al(2018), Mohammed et al (2018), Saatsaz et.al (2018), Yousefi & et al (2018), Soroudi & et al (2018), Soroudi et al (2018), Nabi Dar et al (2018), Yildirim et al (2018), Ding & et al (2018), Mohammed et al(2017), Syed Ismail(2017), Memarbashi et al (2017), Guler & Yomralıoglu (2017), Chabuk et al (2017), Hariz & et al (2017), Kharat et al (2016), Fagbohun & Aladejana (2016), Chauhan & Singh (2016) Soil type C3 Shah & et al (2019),Danesh & et al (2019),Feyzi & et al (2019),Alam & et al (2019), Ghazifard and Mortazavi Chamchali (2019), Abdullah et al(2019), Ebadi Torkayesh et al(2019), Wadhwa (2018), Wichapa & Khokhajaikiat(2018), Midatana et.al(2018,Islam et al(2018), Mohammed et al (2018), Saatsaz et.al (2018), Yousefi & et al (2018), Soroudi & et al (2018), Soroudi et al (2018), Nabi Dar et al (2018), Yildirim et al (2018), Ding & et al (2018), Mohammed et al(2017), Syed Ismail(2017), Memarbashi et al (2017), Guler & Yomralıoglu (2017), Chabuk et al (2017), Hariz & et al (2017), Kharat et al (2016), Fagbohun & Aladejana (2016), Chauhan & Singh (2016) Distance from fault C4 Shah & et al (2019),Danesh & et al (2019),Feyzi & et al (2019),Alam & et al (2019), Ghazifard and Mortazavi Chamchali (2019), Abdullah et al(2019), Ebadi Torkayesh et al(2019), Wadhwa (2018), Wichapa & Khokhajaikiat(2018), Midatana et.al(2018,Islam et al(2018), Mohammed et al (2018), Saatsaz et.al (2018), ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%