2014
DOI: 10.1179/0093469014z.00000000097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Munsell notations and color names: Recommendations for archaeological practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Munsell soil‐color charts (MSCCs) are commonly employed for onsite use by archaeologists, as the MSCCs represent a useful and common tool for evaluating the color of archaeological ceramics found during excavations . Archaeologists are used to employing MSCCs instead of expensive devices such as spectrophotometers and colorimeters, which require specific skills to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Munsell soil‐color charts (MSCCs) are commonly employed for onsite use by archaeologists, as the MSCCs represent a useful and common tool for evaluating the color of archaeological ceramics found during excavations . Archaeologists are used to employing MSCCs instead of expensive devices such as spectrophotometers and colorimeters, which require specific skills to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each chip is denoted by a Munsell notation as well as a color name. Officially, Munsell color codes have no formal prose or vernacular name, although names have been adopted for the MSCC and suggested for other Munsell collections to aid in adoption of the system (e.g., Ferguson 2014). The MSCC documentation indicates that the color name should always be provided alongside the notation (Munsell Color 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%