2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2021)029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muon g − 2 anomaly in anomaly mediation

Abstract: The long-standing muon g − 2 anomaly has been confirmed recently at the Fermilab. The combined discrepancy from Fermilab and Brookhaven results shows a difference from the theory at a significance of 4.2 σ. In addition, the LHC has updated the lower mass bound of a pure wino. In this letter, we study to what extent the g − 2 can be explained in anomaly mediation scenarios, where the pure wino is the dominant dark matter component. To this end, we derive some model-independent constraints on the particle spectr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is confirmed by our numerical results in figure 2 (see the blue and purple shaded regions). The fact that an explanation of (g − 2) µ prefers a light spectrum of sleptons and electroweakinos has been re-emphasized recently in several studies of the MSSM [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88] and of MSSM extensions [89,90]. It is possible to accommodate the preferred value for ∆a µ for a somewhat heavier spectrum (m SUSY 1 TeV) in corners of parameter space with JHEP07(2021)118 either a very large µ term [75,77,85] or with very large values of tan β.…”
Section: Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment In the Mssmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is confirmed by our numerical results in figure 2 (see the blue and purple shaded regions). The fact that an explanation of (g − 2) µ prefers a light spectrum of sleptons and electroweakinos has been re-emphasized recently in several studies of the MSSM [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88] and of MSSM extensions [89,90]. It is possible to accommodate the preferred value for ∆a µ for a somewhat heavier spectrum (m SUSY 1 TeV) in corners of parameter space with JHEP07(2021)118 either a very large µ term [75,77,85] or with very large values of tan β.…”
Section: Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment In the Mssmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been an appreciable number of SUSY-based analyses on (g − 2) µ after the announcement of Fermilab result [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][54][55][56][57]. Some of the above works also involve dark matter constraints.…”
Section: Yukawa Threshold Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the muon g − 2 anomaly can be readily explained in the low energy effective MSSM due to its large number of free soft SUSY-breaking parameters, the explanation is rather challenging in the constrained models with given SUSY breaking mediation mechanisms [30,[41][42][43][44][45], such as mSUGRA/CMSSM, GMSB and AMSB. In these fancy models we have boundary conditions for the soft SUSY-breaking terms at some high energy scale, e.g., the GUT scale in mSUGRA/CMSSM.…”
Section: The Implication For Low Energy Supersymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%