1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5963-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muon-Muon and Other High Energy Colliders

Abstract: 41 Energy vs. ct of µ's at end of decay channel without phase rotation . . 42 Energy vs. ct of µ's at end of decay channel with phase rotation . . . 43 Dispersion Snake: trajectories as seen from the z direction (top); vertical (z) particle positions vs. length (s) along the snake (bottom). . . . . .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Target radii larger than about 1 cm lead to lower pion rates due to reabsorption, while smaller diameter targets have less production from secondary interactions. Tilting the target by 100-150 mrad minimizes loss of pions by absorption in the target after one turn on their helical trajectory [50,120]. Another advantage of the tilted target geometry is that the high energy and neutral components of the shower can be absorbed in a watercooled beam dump to the side of the focused beam.…”
Section: B Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Target radii larger than about 1 cm lead to lower pion rates due to reabsorption, while smaller diameter targets have less production from secondary interactions. Tilting the target by 100-150 mrad minimizes loss of pions by absorption in the target after one turn on their helical trajectory [50,120]. Another advantage of the tilted target geometry is that the high energy and neutral components of the shower can be absorbed in a watercooled beam dump to the side of the focused beam.…”
Section: B Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the Collaboration is to complete within a few years the R&D needed to determine whether a muon collider is technically feasible, and, if it is, to design the first muon collider (FMC). Table I gives the parameters of the muon colliders under study [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], which have COM energies of 0.1, 0.4, and 3 TeV, and Figs. 2 and 3 show possible outlines of the 0.1 and 3 TeV machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a collaboration of over 100 members, lead by BNL, FNAL, LBNL, BNIP, University of Mississippi, Princeton University and UCLA has been formed to coordinate studies on specific designs. Work has been done on designs at a 3-4 TeV, 0.4-0.5 TeV and ≈100 GeV [3][4][5][6][7]. Tb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%