1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.165.1449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muon-Proton Elastic Scattering at High Momentum Transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1970's and 80's, there were several comparisons of electron and muon scattering [6,7] which supported universality of the interaction at the 10% level, but none were precise enough to reveal proton radius issues. The radius of 12 C was determined in electron scattering and in muonic carbon atoms and the results agreed within the error bars of the measurements at that time.…”
Section: Prior Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1970's and 80's, there were several comparisons of electron and muon scattering [6,7] which supported universality of the interaction at the 10% level, but none were precise enough to reveal proton radius issues. The radius of 12 C was determined in electron scattering and in muonic carbon atoms and the results agreed within the error bars of the measurements at that time.…”
Section: Prior Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brought back good memories to me because I had worked on the second g − 2 experiment when I was a postdoc at CERN in 1965-66 [28]; but, of course, Prof. Zichichi worked on the ground-breaking original g − 2 experiment at CERN in 1959-1961 [29]. My thesis research, done at the BNL-AGS from 1961-64, was muon-proton elastic scattering [30] to find out "Why does the muon weigh heavy?" Even in 2013, with Prof. Higgs in the audience, we still don't know!…”
Section: Bnl G-2 Magnet Moves To Fermilabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the muonic hydrogen measurements yield a radius of ≈0.84 fm. Measurements of µ p scattering date back to the 1970s-80s [9,10], and are not precise enough nor low enough in Q 2 to have a clear impact. A recent summary of proton radius extractions is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%