2019
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Murine vs human tissue compositions: implications of using human tissue compositions for photon energy absorption in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the dose to other organs at risk in the irradiation field such as the heart influence pulmonary function and indirectly contribute to adverse effects and should be appropriately modeled as well (198). In this respect dose calculations on human tissues irradiation studies with MeV beams cannot be directly translated to mouse preclinical irradiation studies using KeV beams (199). The use of preclinical micro-irradiators with integrated CT imaging are a new tool to evaluate radiation-induced toxicity closer to clinical irradiation set-up.…”
Section: Intervention and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the dose to other organs at risk in the irradiation field such as the heart influence pulmonary function and indirectly contribute to adverse effects and should be appropriately modeled as well (198). In this respect dose calculations on human tissues irradiation studies with MeV beams cannot be directly translated to mouse preclinical irradiation studies using KeV beams (199). The use of preclinical micro-irradiators with integrated CT imaging are a new tool to evaluate radiation-induced toxicity closer to clinical irradiation set-up.…”
Section: Intervention and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing to the ICRU-44 bone-equivalent plastic (ICRU 1989), the linear attenuation coefficient of our mixture is systematically lower over the whole energy range. Even though it was demonstrated that murine tissue differs, in composition and density, from that of humans (Schyns et al 2019), it is a common practice to use human tissue composition for dose calculation in mice. We can therefore conclude that this surrogate might be used also for lower irradiation energies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a randomly sampled degree of variation is included in the simulation of the X-ray projections. The variation is included in the definition of the random anisotropic voxel size [0.17–0.29 mm], the three-dimensional digital phantom position [± 10 mm], the X-ray projection angle [0–359 degrees], the elemental variation 16 in the tissue composition of ± 5%, and finally a mass density variation of ± 5%. Furthermore, the dataset was augmented through the simulation of mathematical cylinders varying in diameter, position, orientation, and tissue composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hardened X-ray spectrum becomes more penetrating and is therefore introducing an error in the beam intensity measurements. A CBCT image reconstruction without beam hardening correction yields a degraded image quality across uniform volumes, expressed as non-uniform CT numbers, which negatively affects the dosimetric quantities 16 , but also the accuracy of CBCT image feature extraction for which the radiation cabinets could potentially be used 4 , 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation