1997
DOI: 10.2307/3642902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muş in the Early Bronze Age

Abstract: In 1991 a crew of American, Canadian, and Turkish researchers began a new and comprehensive survey in the Muş Province of Eastern Turkey. The goal of the survey was to study the evolution of settlement and landuse in a marginal zone at the intersection of four great culture areas of the Middle East: Central Anatolia, Western Iran, the Transcaucasus, and Mesopotamia.This area of Eastern Turkey had been visited previously by I. K. Kökten in 1940s (1947) and Charles Burney in 1950s (1958). Given the large area th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread use of this pottery may be explained as evidence of a movement of nomadic pastoral groups or traders who also brought their pots or potting techniques with them. Although the newcomers responsible for this phenomenon appear to be small in number, the intermixing of the older local Late Chalcolithic populations and newcomers seems to have led to local variations in this ware in different spatial and temporal contexts (Rothman, Kozbe 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of this pottery may be explained as evidence of a movement of nomadic pastoral groups or traders who also brought their pots or potting techniques with them. Although the newcomers responsible for this phenomenon appear to be small in number, the intermixing of the older local Late Chalcolithic populations and newcomers seems to have led to local variations in this ware in different spatial and temporal contexts (Rothman, Kozbe 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northernmost hydraulic infrastructure surveyed on the Euphrates River is the Alpaslan II dam [60,61]. To the southwest, the archaeological evidence from the Keban dam was collected during the survey project conducted by the METU [34][35][36][37][38][39][40], subsequently integrated by work carried out by the University of Chicago expedition, which explored two specific areas of the reservoir area [62].…”
Section: Medium-scale Approach: the Euphrates River (Nm -Fz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Muş Province west of Lake Van, new sites appeared in the mountainous areas with early Kura-Araxes pottery followed by the appearance of greater population (determined by number of sites and total hectares) in the valley bottom. In the latest phases, residents were using pottery that was a fusion of Kura-Araxes and local Late Chalcolithic techniques (20). Farther west in the Taurus and the Levant, another pattern appeared.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%