Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Torpedo Electric Organ: Effect of Guanine Nucleotides

Abstract

The effect of guanine nucleotides on the binding properties of presynaptic muscarinic receptors has been studied in a membrane preparation from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata by measuring the competitive displacement of the radiolabelled antagonist, [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, by nonradioactive muscarinic ligands. The binding of the antagonists, atropine, scopolamine and pirenzepine was to a single class of sites [slope factors (pseudo Hill coefficients) close to 1] and was unaffected by 0.1 mM GTP. The binding of the N-methylated antagonists, N-methylatropine and N-methyl-scopolamine was more complex (slope factors less than 1) but also insensitive (N-methylatropine) to 0.1 mM GTP. Agonist binding was complex and could be resolved into two binding sites with relatively high and low affinities. The proportion of high-affinity sites varied with the nature of the agonist (15-80%). Agonist binding was depressed by 0.1 mM GTP, and the order of sensitivity was oxotremorine-M greater than carbamoylcholine greater than muscarine greater than acetylcholine greater than arecoline greater than oxotremorine. The binding of pilocarpine, a partial agonist, was unaffected by GTP. With carbamoylcholine as a test ligand the GTP effect on agonist binding was half-maximal at 12 microM. GDP and guanylylimidodiphosphate produced comparable inhibition of carbamoylcholine binding, but GMP and cyclic GMP were ineffective, as were various adenine nucleotides. Analysis of agonist binding in terms of a two-site model indicates that the predominant effect of guanine nucleotides is to reduce the number of sites of higher affinity.

Cholinergic‐Adrenergic Receptor Interactions in Cerebral Microvessels

“…The effect of guanine nucleotides on the displacement by carbachol or by agonists in general exhibits tissue variability. While GTP-induced increases in agonist IC,, are modest for brain muscarinic receptors, the nucleotide effect on the heart is significantly greater (Dowdall et al, 1983). This disparity may result from differences in the level of endogeneous GTP (Hoffman and Lefkowitz, 1980).…”