2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscarinic M1, but not M4, receptor antagonism impairs divided attention in male rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems likely that muscarinic receptor activation is needed for cue detection and sustained attentional processes, as a non-specific muscarinic receptor antagonist is sufficient to impair attentional performance on a two-choice visual discrimination task in mice [53]. Likewise, M1 receptor antagonism impairs performance on a divided attention task in rats, unlike antagonism of the M4 receptor which did not [54]. Additionally, the M1-positive allosteric modulator TAK-071 has been shown to rescue attentional performance in rats with basal forebrain cholinergic cell loss [55].…”
Section: Muscarinic Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems likely that muscarinic receptor activation is needed for cue detection and sustained attentional processes, as a non-specific muscarinic receptor antagonist is sufficient to impair attentional performance on a two-choice visual discrimination task in mice [53]. Likewise, M1 receptor antagonism impairs performance on a divided attention task in rats, unlike antagonism of the M4 receptor which did not [54]. Additionally, the M1-positive allosteric modulator TAK-071 has been shown to rescue attentional performance in rats with basal forebrain cholinergic cell loss [55].…”
Section: Muscarinic Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%