1981
DOI: 10.1016/0048-3575(81)90030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscarinic receptor in house fly brain and its interaction with chlorobenzilate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d-Tubocurarine, a specific vertebrate nicotinic antagonist, did appear to inhibit a proportion of [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine binding at high concentrations in the cockroach. Similar findings of inhibition of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding by relatively low concentrations of dtubocurarine have also been observed in several other invertebrate preparations [6,7,23] However, d-tubocurarine remains several orders of magnitude less active on invertebrate muscarinic receptors than conventional muscarinic ligands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…d-Tubocurarine, a specific vertebrate nicotinic antagonist, did appear to inhibit a proportion of [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine binding at high concentrations in the cockroach. Similar findings of inhibition of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding by relatively low concentrations of dtubocurarine have also been observed in several other invertebrate preparations [6,7,23] However, d-tubocurarine remains several orders of magnitude less active on invertebrate muscarinic receptors than conventional muscarinic ligands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The very high density of [3H]QNB binding sites in TG preparations is closer in magnitude to that of muscarinic AChRs in regions of mammalian brain (Kloog et al, 1979;Salvaterra and Foders, 1979) than to binding site concentrations found in other invertebrate preparations studied, including fly head (Dudai and Ben-Barak, 1977;Jones and Sumikawa, 1981;Shaker and Eldefrawi, 1981) and cockroach nerve cord (Lummis and Sattelle, 1983) homogenates. In contrast, the affinity constant (apparent KD of 5-10 nM) obtained by two independent kinetic methods is very close to that recently described for the cockroach preparation, but is more than an order of magnitude lower than that calculated for most vertebrate neuronal and nonneuronal classes of muscarinic AChRs (e.g., Yamamura and Snyder, 1974;Galper et al, 1977) or for [3H]QNB binding sites in fly head homogenates (Dudai and Ben-Barak, 1977;Jones and Sumikawa, 1981).…”
Section: [3h]qnb Binding Sitesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…4 On the other hand, there is minimal information on the potential of the mAChR as a viable target site for insect control. 5,6 These receptors belong to a di †erent superfamily of proteins, generally referred to as G-coupled proteins. Unlike the nAChR, muscarinic receptors do not contain integral ion channels but rather transduce their signals intracellularly via second messengers (such as cAMP) through interactions with G-coupled proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%