2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle and prosthesis contributions to amputee walking mechanics: A modeling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in line with previous studies [5,8], our patients walked slower than the control subjects mainly owing to reduced cadence, and with the pseudoknee relatively flexed during the gait cycle. The decreased propulsive force of the surgically treated side and loss of original function of the gastrocnemius, which facilitates swing initiation [25], are responsible for the smaller cadence, resulting in slower walking speed [8]. Compared with the only previous short-term study reporting values at a mean of 24 months followup [5], our patients walked with a better vertical force pattern during midstance and with increased knee flexion-extension ROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Finally, in line with previous studies [5,8], our patients walked slower than the control subjects mainly owing to reduced cadence, and with the pseudoknee relatively flexed during the gait cycle. The decreased propulsive force of the surgically treated side and loss of original function of the gastrocnemius, which facilitates swing initiation [25], are responsible for the smaller cadence, resulting in slower walking speed [8]. Compared with the only previous short-term study reporting values at a mean of 24 months followup [5], our patients walked with a better vertical force pattern during midstance and with increased knee flexion-extension ROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The greater MTC on the intact side must have partly resulted from the significantly decreased stance limb knee flexion on the prosthetic side ( Table 2), which would have raised the COM and swing (intact) limb. The reduced stance limb knee flexion observed on the prosthetic side likely reflects a strategy to reduce the knee flexor moment when supporting body weight during single-limb stance [23][24][25][26]. It has been reported previously that a change of 3.3° stance limb knee angle would alter MTC by ±0.45 cm [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The increased energy dissipation would have been due to the hydraulically damped 'ankle' articulation. This suggests that the speed increases were not a result of an increase in 'propulsion' but were driven by an attenuation of the 'braking effect' (Silverman & Neptune, 2012) that would have otherwise been exerted by the prosthetic-foot during prosthetic-limb stance. This braking effect comes from resistance to forwards shank rotation as the foot deforms during loading, which prolongs the period in which the fore-aft ground reaction force (GRF) is directed posteriorly and/or increases the magnitude of this force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%