1977
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1091594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle, Eye and Brain Disease: A New Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Severe brain abnormalities similar to those found in FCMD are reported in the so-called MEB-D, a progres sive form of CMD [10] also characterized by dysplastic ocular alterations. A similar type of CMD has been described as the Walker-Warburg syndrome [11] or cere bro-ocular dysplasia and muscular dystrophy [12], Clini cal and pathological overlap of MEB-D and FCMD [11,14,21] and recent evidence in the same Japanese family of both these CMD forms [22] seem to indicate that they are very close nosographic entities [11,13,[21][22][23], Until recently, in Western countries cases of CCMD have been described as characteristically free from CNS involvement, aside from a possible presence of mild men tal retardation [1][2][3][4], However, in the late seventies and eighties, some cases of CCMD without clinical evidence of CNS involvement at neuroradiological level were found to have subclinical brain alterations [20,[24][25][26][27]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Severe brain abnormalities similar to those found in FCMD are reported in the so-called MEB-D, a progres sive form of CMD [10] also characterized by dysplastic ocular alterations. A similar type of CMD has been described as the Walker-Warburg syndrome [11] or cere bro-ocular dysplasia and muscular dystrophy [12], Clini cal and pathological overlap of MEB-D and FCMD [11,14,21] and recent evidence in the same Japanese family of both these CMD forms [22] seem to indicate that they are very close nosographic entities [11,13,[21][22][23], Until recently, in Western countries cases of CCMD have been described as characteristically free from CNS involvement, aside from a possible presence of mild men tal retardation [1][2][3][4], However, in the late seventies and eighties, some cases of CCMD without clinical evidence of CNS involvement at neuroradiological level were found to have subclinical brain alterations [20,[24][25][26][27]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Clinical evidence of severe or moderate mental retardation and epilepsy is instead characteristic of the Japanese form of CMD (FCMD) described by Fukuyama et al [6]. Recent ly, however, it has been pointed out that also the majority of patients with CCMD at neuroradiological level present signs of cerebral involvement that are often mild and without clinical significance [7][8][9], Apart from symptoms of muscular and cerebral involvement, patients affected by the so-called muscle-eye-brain disease (MEB-D) show also clinical evidence of ocular abnormalities [10]: this variant of CMD is similar to Walker-Warburg syndrome [11] or cerebro-ocular dysplasia-muscular dystrophy [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of both muscular and CNS systems has been reported in some un common myopathies: artrogryposis [9], type II glycogenosis [10], McArdle's disease [11], mitochondrial myopathies [12,13], syn drome of systemic deficiency of carnitine [14], centronuclear myopathy [15,16], 'Mus cle, eye, and brain' syndrome [17], Specific clinical or bioptic findings allow diagnosis of all these entities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) with central nervous system involvement comprises three clinical variants: Fukuyama CMD (FCMD) [Fukuyama et al, 1960], Walker-Warburg syndrome (WWS) [Dobyns et al, 1985;Dobyns et al, 1989], and muscle-eye-brain disease (MEBD) [Raitta et al, 1978;Santavuori and Leisti, 1977]. These entities share clinical manifestations, and the distinction between FCMD and the other two may depend largely on a quantitative difference in severity [Fukuyama, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%