Muscle Force-Velocity Relationships Observed in Four Different Functional Tests

Zivkovic, M.; Djuric, Sasa; Čuk, Ivan; Suzović, Dejan; Jarić, Slobodan

doi:10.1515/hukin-2017-0021

Cited by 41 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Prone bench pull (PBP) is an upper body pulling exercise that is commonly used for training the upper back muscles and testing of upper body pulling strength [5]. Studies have investigated the kinematics and kinetics of this exercise [18][19][20], as well as its relation to sports performance [21][22][23]. Although, the study by Uali et al…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test

Lum

Aziz

2020

Int J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractIsometric strength tests are gaining popularity in recent years. However, no study has validated any isometric strength tests to assess upper body pulling ability. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of isometric prone bench pull. Twenty-three resistance trained athletes (age: 26±4 years, height: 1.75±0.07 m, body mass: 78.6±11.5 kg) were required to perform prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum and isometric prone bench pull tests during the familiarization and actual testing sessions. Isometric prone bench pull was performed at 90° and 120° elbow angles. Peak force and rate of force development measures were highly reliable with intra-correlation coefficient between 0.881–0.987. Peak force obtained from isometric prone bench pull at both elbow angles showed large correlations to prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum (r=0.833–0.858, p<0.01). Linear regression equations to predict 1RM performance from isometric prone bench pull peak force produced an estimated 1RM with a standard error of only 3–6% of the average prone bench pull 1 repetition maximum. The current findings show that isometric prone bench pull is a reliable test and can be used to predict prone bench pull performance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test

Lum

Aziz

2020

Int J Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…V and acceleration of the barbell were calculated as the first, i.e. second derivative of the movement, while F was calculated as the total sum of weight (m x g; mass multiplied by gravity acceleration) and inertia (m x a; mass multiplied by acceleration) of the total mass overcome (Đurić et al, 2016;Srećković et al, 2015;Živković et al, 2017a;Živković, Đurić, Ĉuk, Suzović, & Jarić, 2017b). In case of assessment of W+Itotal force was represented by the sum of weight and inertia of the whole system, i.e.…”

Section: Processing and Analysis Of Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further, it is possible to evaluate the current level of abilities, optimize the training or evaluate the outcome of the conducted training programs (Đurić et al, 2016). Recent studies have shown that the F-V relationship obtained in multi-joint functional movements (walking, running, jumps, throwing, suppressions), is approximately linear, as well as it is a good indicator of the most significant muscle mechanical properties (Cuk et al, 2014;Dobrijević, Ilić, Đurić, & Jarić, 2017;Driss & Vandewalle, 2013;Samozino, Rejc, Di Prampero, Belli, & Morin, 2012;Samozino, Rejc, di Prampero, Belli, & Morin, 2014;Živković, Đurić, Ĉuk, Suzović, & Jarić, 2017a), which speaks in favor of its practical application.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Force-Velocity Relationship of Leg Extensors Obtained From Three Different Types of Load

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first aim of this study was to evaluate the shape of force-velocity (F-V) relationships in case of gravitational (W), inertial (I) and combined (W+I) type of load assessed from squat jump (SJ) performed on a modified Smith machine. The second aim was to determine whether there were differences between the same parameters (maximal force, F0; maximal velocity, V0; maximal power, P0) obtained from linear F-V relationship among three different loads. The third aim was to evaluate the concurrent validity of the parameters F0 obtained from different types of load in SJ, with maximum isometric force in squat (Fiso), as well as one repetition maximum in squat (1RM). Fifteen male participants were tested in SJ with three different types of load, squat for obtaining 1RM and isometric squat for obtaining the Fiso. The observed F-V relationships were exceptionally strong and approximately linear (median r ≥ 0.98) independently of used load. The differences between same parameters of different types of load were determined in parameters F0 and V0, while there were no differences between P0. Regarding third aim, concurrent validity for F0 showed to be moderate to high and significant in all 3 types of load (r ≥ 0.56), except between F0 and Fiso in W type of load, where it was non-significant (r ≥ 0.47). The significance of the study reflects in better understanding of the mechanisms of the functioning of muscle system in case of different types of load. Future studies should investigate the impact of different types of load to kinetic and kinematic parameters in case of different motoric tasks and muscle groups.

show abstract

“…Mehaničke osobine mišića se mogu opisati i relacijom sile i brzine, sile i dužine i sile i vremena [2]. Odnos između sile i brzine (F-V relacija) predstavlja novu tendenciju u testiranju, metodu koja omogućava istovremenu procenu osnovnih mehaničkih osobina mišića [3,4]. Ova metoda je u direktnoj vezi sa biomehaničkom dijagnostikom jer se njihovom zajedničkom upotrebom dolazi do saznanja o svojstvima čovekovog mišićnog sistema.…”

Section: Uvodunclassified

Procena mehaničkih osobina mišića primenom biomehaničke dijagnostike

Čuk¹,

Zivkovic²

2018

Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference - Sinteza 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muscle Force-Velocity Relationships Observed in Four Different Functional Tests

Cited by 41 publications

References 24 publications

Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test

Validity and Reliability of the Isometric Prone Bench Pull Test

Force-Velocity Relationship of Leg Extensors Obtained From Three Different Types of Load

Procena mehaničkih osobina mišića primenom biomehaničke dijagnostike

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About