2018
DOI: 10.3233/ies-172194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle size, strength, power, and echo intensity, but not specific tension, are affected by age in physically active adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rectus femoris muscle was evaluated at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the femoral lateral epicondyle, in a supine position, for muscle thickness and echointensity [38]; at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior pole of the patella, in a sitting position, for echo-intensity [54]; at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior pole of the patella, in a lying position with knees in 10°, for muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area [55]; at 60% (proximal or distal was not described) between the greater trochanter and the lateral epicondyle of the femur, 3 cm lateral to the midline, in a supine position, for muscle thickness and echo-intensity [56]; at 50% between the greater trochanter and the upper edge of the patella, in a supine position, for muscle thickness [57]; at 50% between the greater trochanter and the lateral condyle of the femur, in a supine position with the knees totally extended, for muscle thickness and echo-intensity [42].…”
Section: Upper Legmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rectus femoris muscle was evaluated at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the femoral lateral epicondyle, in a supine position, for muscle thickness and echointensity [38]; at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior pole of the patella, in a sitting position, for echo-intensity [54]; at 50% between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior pole of the patella, in a lying position with knees in 10°, for muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area [55]; at 60% (proximal or distal was not described) between the greater trochanter and the lateral epicondyle of the femur, 3 cm lateral to the midline, in a supine position, for muscle thickness and echo-intensity [56]; at 50% between the greater trochanter and the upper edge of the patella, in a supine position, for muscle thickness [57]; at 50% between the greater trochanter and the lateral condyle of the femur, in a supine position with the knees totally extended, for muscle thickness and echo-intensity [42].…”
Section: Upper Legmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's primary and largest meta-analysis examined the relationships between quadriceps muscle echogenicity and knee extension strength. This pooled analysis included 20 studies and 2924 older adults 7,12,17,18,20,22,23,23,27,30,31,35,37,39,43,45,47,[54][55][56] and demonstrated a modest, negative relationship, with relatively narrow confidence intervals (r=-0.36 [95%CI: -0.38, -0.32], p<0.001). Quadriceps strength has demonstrated moderate to strong relationships to functional tasks, 23 with lower quadriceps strength increasing the odds (OR=3 [95%CI, 1.78 to 5.05]) of falls within older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty studies, including 2924 participants, reported or later provided correlations between quadriceps echogenicity and maximal isometric or concentric knee extension force or torque. 7,12,17,18,20,22,23,23,27,30,31,35,37,39,43,45,47,[54][55][56] Meta-analysis determined a moderate (r=-0.36…”
Section: Knee Extension Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EI and PA have been suggested as surrogate measurements of muscle quality and cellular health, respectively ( Garlini et al 2019 ; Reimers et al 1993 ). Indeed, EI has been shown to be strongly correlated with MRI-based assessments of intramuscular fat ( Young et al 2015 ), is inversely associated and is a significant independent predictor of maximal strength in older adult males ( Cadore et al 2012 ; Watanabe et al 2013 ) and females ( Fukumoto et al 2012 ), and has been shown to increase with age ( Magrini et al 2018 ). Similarly, PA is thought to be associated with cellular health, has been used as a prognostic indicator in various health conditions ( Garlini et al 2019 ) and, accordingly, has been shown to decline with age ( Barbosa-Silva et al 2005 ; Dittmar 2003 ; Norman et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%