2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7865-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle skin temperature responses for hamstring and quadriceps to aerobic and anaerobic test conditions in Turkish Olympic Sailing Athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The part of muscle with more activation (greater heat) was measured by the thermographic camera and the heat was recorded in centigrade. Each participant was thermographically evaluated in the same room (ambient temperature, 21°C) 13 and participants were left for 10-20 minutes to 'acclimatize' to the thermographic imaging environment 14,15 . FLIR E5 Thermal Camera, with a resolution of 120 x 90 pixels was used for thermal imaging and the Color Palette iron was chosen for displaying the images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The part of muscle with more activation (greater heat) was measured by the thermographic camera and the heat was recorded in centigrade. Each participant was thermographically evaluated in the same room (ambient temperature, 21°C) 13 and participants were left for 10-20 minutes to 'acclimatize' to the thermographic imaging environment 14,15 . FLIR E5 Thermal Camera, with a resolution of 120 x 90 pixels was used for thermal imaging and the Color Palette iron was chosen for displaying the images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermographic Assessment: An infrared thermometer, FLIR E5 Thermal Camera (FLIR Systems AB, Sweden) was used for thermographic assessment. In the measurement made with infrared thermography, thermal camera receives and processes the infrared radiation emitted from the surface of the body and records the temperature distribution of the skin (Beneliyahu 1992;Vainer 2005;Cerezci Duygu et al 2018). Each participant was evaluated in the same room (ambient temperature set to 21°C) (Loughin and Marino 2007) and participants were left for 10-20 minutes to 'acclimatize' to the thermographic imaging environment (Tunley and Henson 2004).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%