1995
DOI: 10.1016/0960-8966(94)00057-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle X-inactivation patterns and dystrophin expression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was supported by Yoshioka et al (1998). However, a clear relationship between XCI and clinical phenotype was not found in the study of Matthews et al (1995), where non-manifesting and some manifesting carriers had identical patterns of XCI. XCI in muscle was random in all manifesting carriers investigated.…”
Section: X-linked Disorders Usually Associated With Random XCI and Vamentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This was supported by Yoshioka et al (1998). However, a clear relationship between XCI and clinical phenotype was not found in the study of Matthews et al (1995), where non-manifesting and some manifesting carriers had identical patterns of XCI. XCI in muscle was random in all manifesting carriers investigated.…”
Section: X-linked Disorders Usually Associated With Random XCI and Vamentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Interestingly, we found the same XCI patterns in lymphocyte and muscle DNA, but these analyses could be simultaneously performed in only three patients, which is insufficient to establish a correlation between blood and muscle XCI patterns. Azofeifa et al 27 found a significant statistical correlation between lymphocyte and muscle XCI ratios, whereas Matthews et al 14 showed differences between XCI patterns in muscle and in other tissues, even of same embryonic origin. Furthermore, XCI pattern may be modified in multinucleate muscle fibers compared with single nucleate lymphocytes.…”
Section: Muscle Study and Protein Expression In The Musclementioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 The widely proposed explanation for the occurrence of clinical manifestations in heterozygous females is preferential skewed inactivation of the X chromosome bearing the non-mutated DMD allele. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Female carriers with manifesting muscle weakness usually have a mosaic expression of dystrophin in muscle shown by immunostaining, but the question of a correlation between dystrophin expression and clinical weakness remains debatable. 9,17 In the specific situation of balanced X chromosome-autosome translocations disrupting the dystrophin gene, completely skewed inactivation of the non-translocated X chromosome leads to inactivation of the second DMD allele and therefore to a clinical phenotype as severe as in boys with DMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low efficiency of these methods raises the question of what are therapeutic levels of dystrophin. Studies involving female carriers of mutated dystrophin alleles suggested that levels slightly greater than 50% of normal are protective against skeletal muscle disease (127,538), although other studies of X-linked DCM patients report that levels as low as 30% of normal dystrophin expression can prevent significant skeletal muscle disease (637). The therapeutic threshold in the heart is complicated by the inability to obtain cardiac biopsies to determine the level of expression and by variability in the manifestation of cardiac disease in these patients (288,370,580,649).…”
Section: Dystrophin Gene Transfermentioning
confidence: 98%