1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002690050177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscovite surface structure imaged by fluid contact mode AFM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second category has been proposed to arise from the detection of the K + ions in the hexagonal cavities [49], although as Kuwahara pointed out, this is unlikely due to the ion exchange that often occurs upon immersion in aqueous solution (see below). Kuwahara found that the observation of one or the other of these cases appeared to depend on the direction of the cantilever long axis relative to the fastscan direction [47]. Hence, a simpler interpretation is that with a change in the frictional force signal as the scan axis varies, the image changes from one depicting a hexagon of six basal plane oxygens surrounding a ditrigonal cavity, to one showing hexagonal arrays of three basal plane oxygens, where each triplet of oxygens appears as a bright spot [47] (Figure 3c).…”
Section: The Surface Structure Of Cleaved Mica and The Exchange Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second category has been proposed to arise from the detection of the K + ions in the hexagonal cavities [49], although as Kuwahara pointed out, this is unlikely due to the ion exchange that often occurs upon immersion in aqueous solution (see below). Kuwahara found that the observation of one or the other of these cases appeared to depend on the direction of the cantilever long axis relative to the fastscan direction [47]. Hence, a simpler interpretation is that with a change in the frictional force signal as the scan axis varies, the image changes from one depicting a hexagon of six basal plane oxygens surrounding a ditrigonal cavity, to one showing hexagonal arrays of three basal plane oxygens, where each triplet of oxygens appears as a bright spot [47] (Figure 3c).…”
Section: The Surface Structure Of Cleaved Mica and The Exchange Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuwahara found that the observation of one or the other of these cases appeared to depend on the direction of the cantilever long axis relative to the fastscan direction [47]. Hence, a simpler interpretation is that with a change in the frictional force signal as the scan axis varies, the image changes from one depicting a hexagon of six basal plane oxygens surrounding a ditrigonal cavity, to one showing hexagonal arrays of three basal plane oxygens, where each triplet of oxygens appears as a bright spot [47] (Figure 3c). Note, however, that a transition from one image type to the other may also occur without a change of scan direction [34].…”
Section: The Surface Structure Of Cleaved Mica and The Exchange Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies (Pieranski & Jérôme 1989;Jérôme & Shen 1993;Artsyukhovich et al 1999; Kitaev & Kumacheva 2000) have shown that cyanobiphenyls are anchored at 308 from the g-optical axis of mica anticlockwise and clockwise alternatively for adjacent layers of mica. A separate AFM study indicated that mica is grooved at the angle of 308 from the g-optical axis (Kuwahara 1999) and that molecules are expected to sit along the groove. After 6CB was confined to the thickness of 1 nm, the Raman intensity of its biphenyl ring was obtained at different angles of the linear laser polarization.…”
Section: (B ) Orientation Of a Confined Nematic Liquid Crystalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a tilt of the Al/Si oxide tetrahedra and to the formation of grooves along a 1 1 0 direction of the surface in case of the most common 2M 1 polytype. They have been observed experimentally by atomic force microscopy [74]. These grooves alternate by an angle of 120°between consecutive cleavage layers together with the oriented electric fields of the surface, leading to grooves along the two 1 1 0 directions, not along the optical axis [1 0 0].…”
Section: Fig 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important role of the grooves and the corresponding electrical fields becomes ob-vious, if a mica substrate without these features is used: On phlogopite, a trioctahedral mica without pronounced grooves [73,74], a single growth direction is no longer preferred, and though needles, namely p6P nanofibers grow along all the three epitaxially favoured high symmetry directions simultaneously [10,63]. Epitaxy leads to formation of fibers along the high symmetry directions.…”
Section: Fig 12mentioning
confidence: 99%