2015
DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2015.103.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscular performance adaptations to short-term plyometric training on sand: influence of interday rest

Abstract: Asadi, A. (2015). Muscular performance adaptations to short-term plyometric training on sand: influence of interday rest. J. Hum. Sport Exerc., 10(3), pp.775-784. The aim of the current investigation was to determine the effects of short-term plyometric depth jump training on sand interposed with 48 hours or 72 hours of rest between training sessions on power type muscular adaptations in recreationally physical active men. Fifteen collegiate physical active men, who were familiar with plyometric exercise, part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported extent of plyometric training (1–10) in a program did not significantly differ by competition level, with 47.6, 53.3, and 29.2% of international, professional, and semiprofessional or amateur practitioners, respectively, reporting a 7 out of 10 or greater ( p = 0.38). Including the entire cohort, the average plyometric confidence level of and the extent to which survey respondents used plyometric training in programs was 7.5 ± 1.6 and 5.4 ± 2.6 out of 10, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported extent of plyometric training (1–10) in a program did not significantly differ by competition level, with 47.6, 53.3, and 29.2% of international, professional, and semiprofessional or amateur practitioners, respectively, reporting a 7 out of 10 or greater ( p = 0.38). Including the entire cohort, the average plyometric confidence level of and the extent to which survey respondents used plyometric training in programs was 7.5 ± 1.6 and 5.4 ± 2.6 out of 10, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consensus surrounds the frequency of training with the majority of literature and practitioners reporting twice weekly for the greatest training efficiency (11). However, some authors suggest 72 over 48 hours of rest between sessions for maximal velocity, if training on sand (3). Interestingly, although quite prevalent in research, only 26% of practitioners reported using tuck jump as a common exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of applicable studies creates difficulty in comparing the results of this study to those of others. Asadi (2) reported that a longer 9) reported reductions in counter-movement and squat jump height to below baseline for up to 96 hours after a protocol of drop jumps. These results are in contrast to those reported in this study, where the 24-hour rest time between sessions seemed to have no impact on jump performance in play, and even improved performance in the presession vertical jump test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of applicable studies creates difficulty in comparing the results of this study to those of others. Asadi (2) reported that a longer recovery period between training sessions resulted in greater improvements in jump performance for subjects who completed plyometric training. Miyama and Nosaka (9) reported reductions in counter-movement and squat jump height to below baseline for up to 96 hours after a protocol of drop jumps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%