Museum/space/discourse: analyzing discourse in three dimensions in Denver’s History Colorado Center

Abstract

Museums have recently gained attention from cultural geographers as important sites of cultural production and reproduction. Within this growing field of ‘museum geographies’, we focus on how discourses are arranged in the three-dimensional spaces of galleries and exhibits. We argue that the spatial arrangement of text, media, and artifacts shape narrative storylines and suggest sequences, connections, progressions, and pathways within and between exhibits. In doing so, the spatial arrangement of these museum ‘assemblages’ is tied to the meaning of the underlying discourse. Looking at discourse in three dimensions offers a way for cultural geographers to contribute to an interdisciplinary study of museums, as well as to other modes of discourse where the spatial form of the text contributes to its meaning. We explore this methodology through a study of the History Colorado Center, a recently opened museum in Denver, CO. The center’s exhibits, designed to confront critical histories of the state and the American West, are designed as immersive multimedia reconstructions of Colorado sites and stories, and include iconic regional imagery as well as more dissonant episodes of Colorado’s past. Through an analysis of these exhibits, we highlight how the connections made across museum spaces can enhance or detract from intended exhibit themes. In the History Colorado Center, these spatial arrangements both contribute to and detract from the museum’s presentation of a critically nuanced state history. However, we argue, the spatial arrangements of discourse merit further attention, for museum geographies as well as across other media.

Space, Place, and Countervisuality in Montgomery: A Rhetorical Analysis of the National Memorial for Peace and Justice

“…It is contained within an 11,000-square-foot building that once served as a slave market and houses very few material objects; rather, it creates a countervisual narrative primarily through its use of space. As Smith and Foote (2017) have pointed out, design elements such as layout, positioning, and sequence are all crucial to the discourses presented within any museum and are integral in shaping the meanings visitors derive from their experiences. Similar to the monument, the spatial configuration of the interior supports a continuum from slavery to contemporary violence and invites visitors to translate the emotions generated through their museum experiences into social action.…”

To Make A Difference: Interpersonal Meanings in Museum-Texts: A Case-Study of the Children’s Museum in Amman

“…Furthermore, several museums design and arrange their spaces and exhibits through different scales to narrate, and frame, multiple local, regional, or national narratives. Smith and Foote demonstrate how discourses are arranged in the galleries and exhibits of a museum by arguing that the spatial arrangement of texts, media, and artifacts shape 'narrative storylines' (Smith and Foote, 2017), and these arrangements suggest sequences, connections, progressions, and pathways within, and between, exhibits. In order to reveal these narrative storylines; Smith and Foote suggest that the museum structures and assemblages involve a spatial arrangement that is tied to the meaning of an underlying discourse.…”

Mapping the Idea of Europe – Cultural Production of Border Imaginaries through Heritage

“…Methodologically the analysis builds on the growing tradition of using narrative and discursive approaches to study museums and cultural heritage (e.g. Price 2010; Wu and Hou 2015;Lähdesmäki 2017;Smith and Foote 2017). An essential starting point for the analysis is acknowledging the "thick" nature of maps as sources of knowledge.…”