1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf03393917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Music Distortion: A New Technique for Behavior Modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contingent removal of reinforcement is regarded as a preferred punishment procedure by many clinicians because a physically painful stimulus is not required (Johnston, 1972) and the techniques are readily taught to paraprofessionals (Davison, 1964(Davison, , 1965Laws, Brown, Epstein, & Hocking, 1971) and parents (Barrett, 1969;Nordquist & Wahler, 1973;Wahler, 1969). As a result of its ease of administration and low aversiveness, contingent removal of reinforcement alone or in combination with DRO has been applied to a wide range of problem behaviors including self-stimulation (Greene, Hoats, & Hornick, 1970;Fendergrass, 1972), SIB (Adams, Klinge, & Keiser, 1973;Anderson, Herrman, Alpert, & Dancis, 1975;Brawley et al, 1969, Hamilton, Stephens, & Allen, 1967Harmatz & Rasmussen, 1969;Husted, Hall, & Agin, 1971; J. J. Myers & Deibert, 1971;Wolf, Risley," Johnston, Harris, & Allen, 1967), and aggressive behaviors (Bostow & Bailey, 1969;Drabman & Spitalnik, 1973;Hawkins, Peterson, Schweid, & Bijou, 1966;Husted et al, 1971;Sachs, 1973;Vukelich & Hake, 1971).…”
Section: Contingent Removal Of Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contingent removal of reinforcement is regarded as a preferred punishment procedure by many clinicians because a physically painful stimulus is not required (Johnston, 1972) and the techniques are readily taught to paraprofessionals (Davison, 1964(Davison, , 1965Laws, Brown, Epstein, & Hocking, 1971) and parents (Barrett, 1969;Nordquist & Wahler, 1973;Wahler, 1969). As a result of its ease of administration and low aversiveness, contingent removal of reinforcement alone or in combination with DRO has been applied to a wide range of problem behaviors including self-stimulation (Greene, Hoats, & Hornick, 1970;Fendergrass, 1972), SIB (Adams, Klinge, & Keiser, 1973;Anderson, Herrman, Alpert, & Dancis, 1975;Brawley et al, 1969, Hamilton, Stephens, & Allen, 1967Harmatz & Rasmussen, 1969;Husted, Hall, & Agin, 1971; J. J. Myers & Deibert, 1971;Wolf, Risley," Johnston, Harris, & Allen, 1967), and aggressive behaviors (Bostow & Bailey, 1969;Drabman & Spitalnik, 1973;Hawkins, Peterson, Schweid, & Bijou, 1966;Husted et al, 1971;Sachs, 1973;Vukelich & Hake, 1971).…”
Section: Contingent Removal Of Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both used intermittent schedules to facilitate maintenance of already established reductions in a target behavior. Greene et al (1970) reported that reduced rocking behavior by retarded people was maintained on an intermittent schedule of punishment. Similarly, Clark et al (1973), using four different variable-ratio schedules of isolation for a retarded child's aggressive behavior, found that any schedule with a greater than .23 probability of punishment was effective for maintenance once initial suppression was achieved.…”
Section: Contingent Removal Of Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review of the literature indicates that the use of music, as a means of increasing a desirable response, has been effective in areas such as self-help skills (Harrison, Lecrone, Temerlin, & Trousdale, 1966), activity level (Rieber, 1965), academic behaviors (Madsen & Forsythe, 1973), imitative behaviors (Metzler, 1974), and behavior problems (Greene, Hoats, & Hornick, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%