“…Further inconsistencies were noted, depending on the overall aims of the studies in question. For example, one study focused exclusively on the external event subcategory, whereas eight studies reported only the semantic Healthy adults (8) Aizpurua and Koutstaal (2010), Ally et al (2013), Barnier et al (2014), Belfi, Karlan, and Tranel (2016), Campbell, Nadel, Duke, andRyan (2011), Palombo, Alain, Soderlund, Khuu, and, Rudoy, Weintraub, and Paller (2009), and Sheldon and Chu (2017) Healthy ageing (4) Aizpurua and Koutstaal (2015), Ford, Rubin, and Giovanello (2014) (2008) Other (parietal lesions) (1) Berryhill, Phuong, Picasso, Cabeza, and Olson (2007) Paediatric (2) (2015), Nadel, Campbell, and Ryan (2007), and Rabin and Rosenbaum (2012) Healthy ageing (1) Baron and Bluck (2009) Medial temporal lobe lesions/epilepsy (1) Hornberger et al (2010) Neurodegeneration (5) subcategory. Within the latter eight studies, further variability was evident in that some studies focused only on semantic details and did not report total external details, whereas others adopted a modified scoring system wherein all details were classified as either episodic or semantic.…”