2016
DOI: 10.1080/10632913.2015.1005325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Music teacher stress in the era of accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that teachers prefer to stay away from managerial processes. This finding is similar to findings of Shaw's (2016) research. In Shaw's research, it was found that dealing with administrative job responsibilities was stressful for teachers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This suggests that teachers prefer to stay away from managerial processes. This finding is similar to findings of Shaw's (2016) research. In Shaw's research, it was found that dealing with administrative job responsibilities was stressful for teachers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is much research that supports evidence of stress and burnout in the working lives of music educators (Bernhard, 2016; Doss, 2016; Figueras, 2014; Shaw, 2016; Vitale, 2015). Common triggers include the preparation of performances, heavy workload and a lack of resources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professional development requirements also shifted during the NCLB era, requiring music educators to attend conferences and workshops targeted at improving math and reading scores rather than teaching music (West, 2012). In addition, music teachers experienced added levels of stress after the introduction of increased accountability such as teacher evaluation, changes in teacher tenure, meeting test-based school rating, uncertainty of job security, and increased workload (Shaw, 2016). These systemic changes may have driven music educators to leave the teaching profession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%