2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712223114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better

Abstract: The idea that musical training improves speech perception in challenging listening environments is appealing and of clinical importance, yet the mechanisms of any such musician advantage are not well specified. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that musicians outperformed nonmusicians in identifying syllables at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), which was associated with stronger activation of the left inferior frontal and right auditory regions in musicians compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
113
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…in rhythm information perception 36 , 37 , or spectral information perception 38 40 ) stems from the difference of operating regimes between musicians and non-musicians. In our tasks, the fact that musicians outperform non-musicians in the least predictable condition likely reflects that musicians are less susceptible to informational masking, when using both masking noise (Figs 1 and 2 ) and masking tones (Figs 3 and 6 ), also meaning that they are better in tone-in-noise perception 41 , 42 . This also reflects that musicians have enhanced auditory short-term memory 43 , 44 , and, as other perceptual experts, have better auditory sustained attention for complex tone patterns 25 , 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…in rhythm information perception 36 , 37 , or spectral information perception 38 40 ) stems from the difference of operating regimes between musicians and non-musicians. In our tasks, the fact that musicians outperform non-musicians in the least predictable condition likely reflects that musicians are less susceptible to informational masking, when using both masking noise (Figs 1 and 2 ) and masking tones (Figs 3 and 6 ), also meaning that they are better in tone-in-noise perception 41 , 42 . This also reflects that musicians have enhanced auditory short-term memory 43 , 44 , and, as other perceptual experts, have better auditory sustained attention for complex tone patterns 25 , 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Singing can also improve speech-related auditory-motor interactions and functional connectivity between auditory and speech motor regions. These both improve with more music training and may partially underlie enhanced perception of speech in noise (Du & Zatorre, 2017). Notably, in the aforementioned study more than half of the musicians participated also voice (singing) training.…”
Section: Perception Of Speech In Noise In the Two CI Groupsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A second goal of this study was to investigate transfer of musical training to the perception of speech in complex environments. There have been many reports of a musician advantage for speech perception in speech maskers (Baskent and Gaudrain, 2016;Clayton et al, 2016;Deroche et al, 2017;Du and Zatorre, 2017;Meha-Bettison et al, 2017;Morse-Fortier et al, 2017;Parbery-Clark et al, 2009;Slater and Kraus, 2016;Swaminathan et al, 2015;Yeend et al, 2017;Zendel and Alain, 2012; for a review see Coffey et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%