2015
DOI: 10.1525/rep.2015.132.1.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musicology in the Garden

Abstract: This essay reflects on the role of aesthetics in the birth of musicology and asks to what extent musicology’s turn to materiality, via the work of Bruno Latour, might become a return to the discipline’s foundational principles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genre theory and how it decentres the musical subject while retaining a focus on aesthetic and affective processes would be one fertile guide (Brackett 2005;Born 2011;Drott 2013;Brackett 2016). Novel approaches to aesthetics that encompass mediation (Born 1991;Born 2017), including 'pleasure in mediation' (Guillory 2010, 357) and 'aesthetic investments … directed far beyond the frame of the artwork' (Dolan 2015), would also be productive, as would engagement with ideas of affective objects (Navaro-Yashin 2009) and theories of musical affect predicated on the intimate bond between affect and mediation (Stirling 2019). Given that human actors' explanations are not infallible guides, since they may 'betray the workings of an ideology that has receded into the background of thought' (Piekut 2014, 210, fn 76), a concern with the articulation of subjectivity and ideology might also be fruitful.…”
Section: What Is To Be Learned?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genre theory and how it decentres the musical subject while retaining a focus on aesthetic and affective processes would be one fertile guide (Brackett 2005;Born 2011;Drott 2013;Brackett 2016). Novel approaches to aesthetics that encompass mediation (Born 1991;Born 2017), including 'pleasure in mediation' (Guillory 2010, 357) and 'aesthetic investments … directed far beyond the frame of the artwork' (Dolan 2015), would also be productive, as would engagement with ideas of affective objects (Navaro-Yashin 2009) and theories of musical affect predicated on the intimate bond between affect and mediation (Stirling 2019). Given that human actors' explanations are not infallible guides, since they may 'betray the workings of an ideology that has receded into the background of thought' (Piekut 2014, 210, fn 76), a concern with the articulation of subjectivity and ideology might also be fruitful.…”
Section: What Is To Be Learned?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The musicologist Emily I Dolan (2015). discussesLatour's (2004b) suggestion, as referenced byBarad (2012c), to consider in the "thing .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…matters of fact and matters of concern"(Latour 2004b, 233, emphasis removed). ForDolan (2015), the turn to materiality via Latour's work offers musicology "one path back to Adler's garden, whereby we can recast the loving adoration of musical culture as a new kind of worthy intellectual engagement" (91). Dolan sees Latour's notion of "concern" as (merely) a reminder of "the role aesthetics [played] in the birth of musicology" and the richness of "the discipline's foundational principles" as articulated by Guido Adler in the late 1800s (88).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%