Islamverherrlichung 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92384-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muslim sein – eine Frage der Person

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the definitive infectious etiology of GPI was not proven until early in the 20th century, the distinctiveness of the syndrome—its specific neurologic signs and rapid deteriorative course—were well recognized by the mid-19th century. For example, in describing his research program for turning psychiatric syndromes in diseases, Hecker saw GPI as the paradigmatic successful example: “The only real disease form, which has gained entry into psychiatry, provides the best evidence for this: the so-called progressive paralysis of the insane [AKA GPI].” (p353) Many other descriptions in the late 19th century by prominent neuropsychiatrists, including Kraepelin, document the paradigmatic role played by GPI in the search for monocausal psychiatric disorders (eg, see Kahlbaum, (p27) Behr, (p5) Daraszkiewicz, (p10) and Kraepelin (p132) ).…”
Section: Toward One Causementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the definitive infectious etiology of GPI was not proven until early in the 20th century, the distinctiveness of the syndrome—its specific neurologic signs and rapid deteriorative course—were well recognized by the mid-19th century. For example, in describing his research program for turning psychiatric syndromes in diseases, Hecker saw GPI as the paradigmatic successful example: “The only real disease form, which has gained entry into psychiatry, provides the best evidence for this: the so-called progressive paralysis of the insane [AKA GPI].” (p353) Many other descriptions in the late 19th century by prominent neuropsychiatrists, including Kraepelin, document the paradigmatic role played by GPI in the search for monocausal psychiatric disorders (eg, see Kahlbaum, (p27) Behr, (p5) Daraszkiewicz, (p10) and Kraepelin (p132) ).…”
Section: Toward One Causementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Kraepelin was, in his long academic career, professor (that is head) of the Department of Psychiatry of two of the most distinguished departments in the German-speaking world Heidelberg and Munich (Engstrom, 1991). He trained many students who did theses on topics of particular interest to him, for example, Daraszkiewicz on hebephrenia (Daraszkiewicz, 1892; Kendler, 2020b), Behr on catatonia (Behr, 1891; Kendler, 2020a), and Dreyfus on involutional melancholia (Dreyfus, 1907; Kendler and Engstrom, 2020). He was able to launch research programs especially in Heidelberg and, later, Munich that examined specifically the relationship between clinical presentation and course of illness (Engstrom, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was at this time, surely no accident, that Kraepelin commissioned 2 students to do dissertations involving literature reviews and clinical studies of catatonia and hebephrenia …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, I provide an overview and synthesis aided by reviews of critical parts of his fourth, fifth, and sixth editions; his autobiography; published lectures of Kraepelin from 1896 and 1899; and his student Aschaffenburg in 1897 . I outline the main features of this story in Table 1 and the Figure . (Table 2 contains supplementary quotes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%