2023
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202203342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mussel Foot Protein Inspired Tape‐Type Adhesive with Water‐Responsive, High Conformal, Tough, and On‐Demand Detachable Adhesion to Wet Tissue

Abstract: Wet adhesion is highly demanded in noninvasive wound closure, tissue repair, and biomedical devices, but it is still a big challenge for developing biosafe and tough wet bioadhesives due to low or even nonadhesion in the wet state for conventional adhesives. Inspired by the wet‐adhesion‐contributing factors of mussel foot proteins, a water‐responsive dry robust tissue adhesive PAGU tape is made with thickness of <0.5 mm through fast UV‐initiated copolymerization of acrylic acid (AA), gelatin (Gel), and hexadec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the interfacial adhesion is relatively weak to low surface energy adherends such as PE, PC, and PMMA because van der Waals and hydrophobic associations prevail at the interfaces. The interfacial toughness of mTA 5 -PAA/PEI 3 exceeds that of many reported wTA PEC hydrogel materials, such as polyTA–PETEA–PEGDA–agar and PAGU hydrogels with wet interfacial toughness values of 858 and 818 J/m 2 , respectively, and the interface toughness of our work is approximately 1.8 times that of both (Figure I and Table S3) ,, and higher than that of common commercial TAs, such as commercially available cyanoacrylate (Histoyl) and fibrin sealant (Tisseel), both of which have interfacial toughness less than 20 J/m 2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…However, the interfacial adhesion is relatively weak to low surface energy adherends such as PE, PC, and PMMA because van der Waals and hydrophobic associations prevail at the interfaces. The interfacial toughness of mTA 5 -PAA/PEI 3 exceeds that of many reported wTA PEC hydrogel materials, such as polyTA–PETEA–PEGDA–agar and PAGU hydrogels with wet interfacial toughness values of 858 and 818 J/m 2 , respectively, and the interface toughness of our work is approximately 1.8 times that of both (Figure I and Table S3) ,, and higher than that of common commercial TAs, such as commercially available cyanoacrylate (Histoyl) and fibrin sealant (Tisseel), both of which have interfacial toughness less than 20 J/m 2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…However, the interaction between the hydrogel and wood interface is more mechanically interlocking than that between hydrogel and PET. [43]…”
Section: Wet Adhesive Mechanism and Debondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] Recently, on-demand detachable adhesive tape was developed for wet tissue adhesion by Peng et al but it needs UV-radiation for curing the adhesive and the resulted adhesive tape has inferior optical transparency as compared to our PECs adhesive, which discussed in next section. [41]…”
Section: Adhesive Strength Testing On Mammalian Bonesmentioning
confidence: 99%