1983
DOI: 10.1086/268811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Must Respondent Selection Procedures for Telephone Surveys Be Invasive?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Random Walk tables were designed using three separate random number generators to select respondent households. Fourth, individuals within each randomly selected household were identified using the ‘Hagan–Collier alternative’ method with 50–50 gender parity [19, 20]. In each selected location, 100 participants were randomly sampled to facilitate analysis within and between locations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Walk tables were designed using three separate random number generators to select respondent households. Fourth, individuals within each randomly selected household were identified using the ‘Hagan–Collier alternative’ method with 50–50 gender parity [19, 20]. In each selected location, 100 participants were randomly sampled to facilitate analysis within and between locations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample II (HCP) was chosen using the Hagan and Collier (1983) method. The probability of selection was based on the sampling fraction, n/N.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three stages of sample selection were of telephone exchanges, selection of telephone households, and selection of respondents. Respondent selection procedures were by a method that has been shown to produce effectively the same results as the Troldahl-Carter technique but avoids the use of invasive questions (see Hagan & Collier, 1983). Full details of the sampling methods are available in Chilton (no date).…”
Section: Summary and 1985b) > Evidence That Deri Y Es Fr°mmentioning
confidence: 99%