1981
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(81)90176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagen sensitivities and mutator effects of MMS-sensitive mutants in neurospora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMS-sensitivity was determined in two different ways: First, the wild type and mutant conidia were treated with 0 5 % of MMS for different time intervals and were then plated on normal growth medium to examine their capabilities in repairing the damages inflicted on DNA, as estimated by their survival frequency. Such a lack of the dose response has been reported earlier (Kafer, 1981). These data are depicted in Figs 3 and 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MMS-sensitivity was determined in two different ways: First, the wild type and mutant conidia were treated with 0 5 % of MMS for different time intervals and were then plated on normal growth medium to examine their capabilities in repairing the damages inflicted on DNA, as estimated by their survival frequency. Such a lack of the dose response has been reported earlier (Kafer, 1981). These data are depicted in Figs 3 and 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A number of genes are known to control mutagen sensitivities in Neurospora crassa (Schroeder, 1975;Kafer, 1981;Fraser & Kafer, 1979;Delange & Mishra 1981, 1982. The present nuc mutants do not appear to be allelic to either of the previously described mutants because of their particular location on the linkage group II (right to the arg-12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The deduced amino acid sequence showed that the mus-11 gene encodes the homolog of S. cerevisiae Rad52p (paper in preparation). The mus-11 mutant showed a low level of induced mutability and a high frequency of spontaneous mutation (Kafer 1981). These results indicate that the mutagenesis process diers in in each of the mei-3, mus-25 and mus-11 mutants, although it is presumed that these gene products work as a complex, at the same repair stage, as they do in S. cerevisiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, mus-10 did not display several phenotypes common to other members of the uvs-6 epistasis group: chromosomal instability, a high sensitivity to histidine, and the inability to produce viable ascospores in homozygous crosses Kafer and Perlmutter 1980;Kafer 1981;Schroeder 1986;Watanabe et al 1997;Handa et al 2000;Sakuraba et al 2000). Furthermore, the frequencies of spontaneous and radiation-induced mutation observed in mus-10 were similar to those of a wild-type strain (Kafer 1981). Past efforts to uncover the nature of these discrepancies or the function of the mus-10 gene product have been uninformative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%