2015
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.4095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation Analysis of IDH1/2 Genes in Unselected De novo Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients in India - Identification of A Novel IDH2 Mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were also in agreement with reports stating that IDH2 mutated patients displayed infrequent NPM1 mutations and lower WBC count (DiNardo et al, 2016). Like others, we have found that IDH mutations were mutually exclusive with CBF AML (Raveendran et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results were also in agreement with reports stating that IDH2 mutated patients displayed infrequent NPM1 mutations and lower WBC count (DiNardo et al, 2016). Like others, we have found that IDH mutations were mutually exclusive with CBF AML (Raveendran et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We have correlated IDH mutations with patient characteristics, different laboratory findings and AML prognostic factors. There was a female predominance for IDH mutations (3M/7F), but the difference was not significant and this result was in agreement with another report (Raveendran et al, 2015). We have not found a significant relation between IDH mutations and Hb concentration, TLC and platelet count (p=0.924 , 0.611 and 0.0935 respectively) which was in agreement with another report (Patel et al, 2011).…”
Section: Molecular Mutationssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation of IDH mutations with patient characteristics, various laboratory results and AML prognostic factors were studied. IDH mutations were more common in male, although the difference was not statistically significant and this result was in inconsistent with other report (Raveendran et al, 2015;Ali et al, 2018;ElNahass et al, 2020;Pastore et al,2022). In agreement with another report (Patel et al, 2011), we did not find a significant correlation between IDH mutations and TLC, Hb concentration, or platelets count (p= 0.166 , 0.981 and 0.483 respectively).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…In our study cohort, the frequency of IDH1 mutations was 3.5% and the frequency of IDH2 mutations was 4.3%. However, in another study, IDH1/2 mutations were found in 5.5% and 4%, respectively (Raveendran et al, 2015) and IDH1 and 2 mutations were detected in 2. 9% and 11.4%, respectively (ElNahass et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%