2014
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.3-18.v2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation extraction tools can be combined for robust recognition of genetic variants in the literature

Abstract: As the cost of genomic sequencing continues to fall, the amount of data being collected and studied for the purpose of understanding the genetic basis of disease is increasing dramatically. Much of the source information relevant to such efforts is available only from unstructured sources such as the scientific literature, and significant resources are expended in manually curating and structuring the information in the literature. As such, there have been a number of systems developed to target automatic extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This nomenclature in principle provides a technique for straightforward identification of intergenic regions, by looking for genomic variants and cross-referencing their positions with the gene starts/stops in the reference sequences. However, our prior experience with text mining of genetic variants ( Jimeno Yepes & Verspoor, 2014b ) suggests that these descriptors are extremely rarely used in practice. The vast majority of references to genetic variants in the literature refer to coding DNA or protein variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nomenclature in principle provides a technique for straightforward identification of intergenic regions, by looking for genomic variants and cross-referencing their positions with the gene starts/stops in the reference sequences. However, our prior experience with text mining of genetic variants ( Jimeno Yepes & Verspoor, 2014b ) suggests that these descriptors are extremely rarely used in practice. The vast majority of references to genetic variants in the literature refer to coding DNA or protein variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on automatic variant discovery in the literature has largely focused on finding variant descriptions in paper titles and abstracts with high accuracy without converting the discovered variants to genomic coordinates [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . Previous automatic variant curation tools have also focused on mapping variant mentions to dbSNP 23 variant identifiers (rsIDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a gap between the research community and the biomedical textmining community. Yepes and Verspour compare in (Yepes & Verspoor, 2014) the performance of EMU, OMM, MF, tmVar and SETH intrinsically on the Variome corpus, and extrinsically on the COSMIC and InSiGHT database. The study also discusses the technical aspects related to using the tools; some of them require an intermediate to advanced level of programming knowledge to use them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%