2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09380-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation pattern in 606 Duchenne muscular dystrophy children with a comparison between familial and non-familial forms: a study in an Indian large single-center cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Chinese study, the percentage of rearrangements in DMD patients is similar to ours, with 60% of deletions and 9.6% of duplications (Guo et al, 2015) while in an Indian cohort (Polavarapu et al, 2019) there was a higher prevalence of deletions (80%) and only a small percentage of duplications (5%) with a complete absence of the most common exon 2 duplication. In a very large sample population of United Dystrophinopathy Project, Flanigan et al (2009) reported a 43% percentage of deletions and 11% of duplications in all the dystrophinopathy patients (including DMD, BMD, and intermediate phenotypes); the low percentage of deletion compared to the one reported in literature is discussed as due to a selection bias.…”
Section: Dmd Deletions and Duplications: Frequency Distribution Topsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In a Chinese study, the percentage of rearrangements in DMD patients is similar to ours, with 60% of deletions and 9.6% of duplications (Guo et al, 2015) while in an Indian cohort (Polavarapu et al, 2019) there was a higher prevalence of deletions (80%) and only a small percentage of duplications (5%) with a complete absence of the most common exon 2 duplication. In a very large sample population of United Dystrophinopathy Project, Flanigan et al (2009) reported a 43% percentage of deletions and 11% of duplications in all the dystrophinopathy patients (including DMD, BMD, and intermediate phenotypes); the low percentage of deletion compared to the one reported in literature is discussed as due to a selection bias.…”
Section: Dmd Deletions and Duplications: Frequency Distribution Topsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The analysis of mutation spectrum has revealed mutations in 80.85% DMD cases with 73% deletions and 7% duplications in unrelated families. Previous Indian studies have reported 75% [16] and 86.6% [22] mutation detection rate by MLPA. Spectrin repeat domain was found to be affected in the majority of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the time exon skipping therapy becomes costeffective and more technologies emerge with time, there may be an impending requirement to generate a populationspecific DMD mutation database. Majority of the DMD mutation data has been reported from the South Indian population [22] which differs from the North Indian population with respect to ethnic background. Moreover, North Indian studies have been dominated by mPCR and thus may underrepresent the mutation spectrum of DMD gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, many studies have been published for NGS-based approaches for MD ( Lim et al, 2011 ; Wang et al, 2014 ; Wei et al, 2014 ; Alame et al, 2016 ). However, there are very few such studies reported for the Indian population ( Aravind et al, 2019 ; Ganapathy et al, 2019 ; Polavarapu et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%